On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 21:55, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-02 10:11 +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > Presently, this entity is 9.0, and has been last changed in July 2019. The
> > questions are:
> > - what's its use?
> > - if it is used, shouldn't it be changed to 9.2?
On 3/2/20 9:06 AM, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
On 3/2/20 3:11 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
Presently, this entity is 9.0, and has been last changed in July
2019. The
questions are:
- what's its use?
- if it is used, shouldn't it be changed to 9.2?
- it not, shouldn't it be
Le 02/03/2020 à 16:06, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev a écrit :
> On 3/2/20 3:11 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
>> Presently, this entity is 9.0, and has been last changed in July 2019. The
>> questions are:
>> - what's its use?
>> - if it is used, shouldn't it be changed to 9.2?
>> - it not,
On 3/2/20 3:11 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
Presently, this entity is 9.0, and has been last changed in July 2019. The
questions are:
- what's its use?
- if it is used, shouldn't it be changed to 9.2?
- it not, shouldn't it be removed?
I just forgot to make it completed. Now done
On 2020-03-02 10:11 +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> Presently, this entity is 9.0, and has been last changed in July 2019. The
> questions are:
> - what's its use?
> - if it is used, shouldn't it be changed to 9.2?
> - it not, shouldn't it be removed?
I think it isn't used at all and
Presently, this entity is 9.0, and has been last changed in July 2019. The
questions are:
- what's its use?
- if it is used, shouldn't it be changed to 9.2?
- it not, shouldn't it be removed?
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
