Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-20 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:03:43PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > What I meant is that I don't like to put patches in the book(s) for small > one or two line changes. There are two reasons. First, from the editor's > point of view it requires formatting the patch, committing it, and > documenting

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:48:39AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: Meanwhile, I see Bruce has had a reply on the util-linux list. Unfortunately, github.com doen't offer plain-text versions of commits. I've cloned it, and am attaching in case it helps : works fo

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-19 Thread Armin K.
On 08/20/2014 12:15 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:48:39AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Ken Moffat wrote: >>> >>> Meanwhile, I see Bruce has had a reply on the util-linux list. >>> Unfortunately, github.com doen't offer plain-text versions of >>> commits. I've cloned it, and a

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:48:39AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Meanwhile, I see Bruce has had a reply on the util-linux list. > >Unfortunately, github.com doen't offer plain-text versions of > >commits. I've cloned it, and am attaching in case it helps : works > >for me.

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:47:33PM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: The values are the same, but the units are different, because these are two different limits. The shmmax limit (see ... I think the shmget(2) manpage, if memory serves) is expressed in bytes, bu

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 06:51:07PM +0300, Markku Pesonen wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > Unfortunately, github.com doen't offer plain-text versions of > > commits. > > Just for future reference, you can add ".patch" at the end of a GitHub > URL to get the plain-text, like this: > https://github.com

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-19 Thread Markku Pesonen
Ken Moffat wrote: > Unfortunately, github.com doen't offer plain-text versions of > commits. Just for future reference, you can add ".patch" at the end of a GitHub URL to get the plain-text, like this: https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/3a9ec12d6664527fad9c56347c88f3447d6c0856.patch --

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:47:33PM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > The values are the same, but the units are different, because these are two > different limits. > > The shmmax limit (see ... I think the shmget(2) manpage, if memory serves) is > expressed in bytes, but the s

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-18 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:04:59PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> I ran a full build after resetting shmall and all tests were normal. I rebooted with linux-3.16 and again got this huge value. Rebooted to the same

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:04:59PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: I ran a full build after resetting shmall and all tests were normal. I rebooted with linux-3.16 and again got this huge value. Rebooted to the same / partition with linux-3.13.3 and got a normal

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-18 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:04:59PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > >I ran a full build after resetting shmall and all tests were normal. I > >rebooted with linux-3.16 and again got this huge value. Rebooted to the > >same / partition with linux-3.13.3 and got a normal value.

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: ken@jtm1 ~ $cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall 18446744073692774399 ken@jtm1 ~ $uname -a Linux jtm1 3.16.0 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Aug 6 02:25:22 BST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux ken@jtm1 ~ $cat /etc/lfs-release LFS svn 20140803 (r10674) plus linux-3.16 headers And yes, when I look I can see

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:26:34AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I built LFS today using Armin's version of glibc-2.20. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~krejzi/glibc-2.20.tar.xz At the same time, I adjusted the gcc instructions to omit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-sh

Re: [lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-18 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:26:34AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I built LFS today using Armin's version of glibc-2.20. > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~krejzi/glibc-2.20.tar.xz > > At the same time, I adjusted the gcc instructions to omit > > --enable-clocale=gnu > --enable-shared >

[lfs-dev] Testing glibc-2.20

2014-08-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I built LFS today using Armin's version of glibc-2.20. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~krejzi/glibc-2.20.tar.xz At the same time, I adjusted the gcc instructions to omit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit In Chapter 5 gcc-pass2 a