To add to this, my understanding of why you need the symlink at all has to
do with overcoming some hard assumptions in the build systems of certain
packages. A lot of system programs wind up hardcoding paths into their
executables and scripts so that they are using their expected versions and
On 5/19/20 2:25 PM, Akira Urushibata via lfs-dev wrote:
Is there any problem with making a new directory at the filesystem
base level?
In theory there could be a distribution which already has a /tool
directory. But I have never heard of that.
What alternatives are there to /tool ? If /tool
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:33 PM Akira Urushibata via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> Is there any problem with making a new directory at the filesystem
> base level?
>
> In theory there could be a distribution which already has a /tool
> directory. But I have never heard of that.
>
> What alternatives are
Is there any problem with making a new directory at the filesystem
base level?
In theory there could be a distribution which already has a /tool
directory. But I have never heard of that.
What alternatives are there to /tool ? If /tool is so abhored, why
not try /usr/local instead ? What
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 6:46 AM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-16 06:03 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 5:48 AM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > On 2020-05-16 04:37 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 16,
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 5:48 AM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-16 04:37 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 4:19 AM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > On 2020-05-15 19:28 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 15,
On 2020-05-16 04:37 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 4:19 AM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > On 2020-05-15 19:28 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:48 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 4:19 AM Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-15 19:28 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:48 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 18:21 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev
> > > wrote:
> > >
On 2020-05-15 19:28 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:48 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 18:21 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > Hey there,
> > >
> > > I'd like to inquire about the actual need for the
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:48 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 18:21 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev
> wrote:
> > Hey there,
> >
> > I'd like to inquire about the actual need for the /toolchain symlink
> > on the host system.
> >
> > Apparently, failure to
On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 18:21 +0300, Firas Khalil Khana via lfs-dev
wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'd like to inquire about the actual need for the /toolchain symlink
> on the host system.
>
> Apparently, failure to create this link causes
> configure/build/linking
> problems starting from Chapter's 5
Hey there,
I'd like to inquire about the actual need for the /toolchain symlink
on the host system.
Apparently, failure to create this link causes configure/build/linking
problems starting from Chapter's 5 libstdc++ with errors in the form
of failure to perform sanity checks (mostly because
12 matches
Mail list logo
