Hello all,
i finished building LFS yesterday and everything worked fine.
Apart from ifconfig. How come? Actually i searched thru Freshmeat
and found the binaries from net-tools, which also included ifconfig.
I extracted it into a folder and configured it:
But during compilation i get the foll
Karna Puri-Sengupta wrote:
Hello all,
i finished building LFS yesterday and everything worked fine.
Apart from ifconfig. How come? Actually i searched thru Freshmeat
and found the binaries from net-tools, which also included ifconfig.
I extracted it into a folder and configured it:
But during com
Hey jim,
thanxs for the quick answer.
When i used ifconfig the syntax was as following:
ifconfig eth0 ip.ad.dr.ess netmask ne.t.mas.sk up
How do i use ip add ?
When i type :
ip addr add 10.0.2.88 eth0
it gives:
Error: either 'local' is dublicate, or 'eth0' is garbage.
Where is the mistake
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:34:19AM +0100, Karna Puri-Sengupta wrote:
> Hey jim,
>
> thanxs for the quick answer.
>
> When i used ifconfig the syntax was as following:
>
> ifconfig eth0 ip.ad.dr.ess netmask ne.t.mas.sk up
>
> How do i use ip add ?
>
> When i type :
>
> ip addr add 10.0.2.88 et
problem solved, had to do with optimizations
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
hi guys. i'm using LFS-6.0 and my problem is in chapter 5.34 (Perl
5.8.5) Everything has worked fine up to now. (Host system is SuSE9.1Pro)
I get the following error
makefile: line 917 *** missing seperator. stop
i tried editing line 917 which only had a '0' on the line by commenting
it out. I re
Donal Farrell wrote:
hi guys. i'm using LFS-6.0 and my problem is in chapter 5.34 (Perl
5.8.5) Everything has worked fine up to now. (Host system is SuSE9.1Pro)
I get the following error
makefile: line 917 *** missing seperator. stop
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#perl-missing-separat
First of all let me say how great I think LFS is. I'm pretty disgusted
with distros right now. Thanks for the effort. As my knowlege and
skill increase (I hope), I'd like to contribute. But for now, I must
just build.
I'm using Version 6.0. In 4.2 "Creating the $LFS/tools Directory," the
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 14:32 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>
> is given. I understand the syntax--and I even read the FAQ . My
> question is in the location of the link. I don't want my distro to
> think that everything is mounted in $LFS/tools.
>
The book is usually right. Assuming that LFS
hello there. i'm at part 6.14 which is the final installation of GCC. I
am getting the following error from make continuously:
In file included from ../../gcc-3.4.1/gcc/crtstuff.c:62:
../../gcc-3.4.1/gcc/tsystem.h:79:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
../../gcc-3.4.1/gcc/tsystem.h:82:23: sys/t
hello there. i'm at part 6.14 which is the final installation of GCC. I
am getting the following error from make continuously:
In file included from ../../gcc-3.4.1/gcc/crtstuff.c:62:
../../gcc-3.4.1/gcc/tsystem.h:79:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
../../gcc-3.4.1/gcc/tsystem.h:82:23: sys/t
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
The book is usually right.
*usually*? :) I'd prefer that to be "always" :) Bug reports welcome of
course, if your conscience can't bring you to write the latter!
Yours somewhat jokingly,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 21:09 +, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
> > The book is usually right.
>
> *usually*? :) I'd prefer that to be "always" :) Bug reports welcome of
> course, if your conscience can't bring you to write the latter!
>
> Yours somewhat jokingly,
>
> M
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 14:32 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
is given. I understand the syntax--and I even read the FAQ . My
question is in the location of the link. I don't want my distro to
think that everything is mounted in $LFS/tools.
The book is usually righ
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 14:32 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
is given. I understand the syntax--and I even read the FAQ . My
question is in the location of the link. I don't want my distro to
think that everything is mounted in $LFS/tools.
The book is usually righ
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 16:37 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
> Let's say for sake of argument I've started in my home directory. Now
> let me ask if this sequence of code is correct to get to putting the
> symlink in the right place.
>
> # su
> # echo $LFS
> /mnt/lfs
> # mkdir $LFS/tools
> # cd $LFS/to
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
Step 4 (cd $LFS/tools) is unnecessary and has no bearing
on the link creation. You could be in *any* directory when it is
executed.
In effect the command states.
Take the last element of the first parameter and use it as the name for
the symlink in the second parameter.
Okay, I need a bit of udev help. I want to write a rule to create a dvd
synlink. The /proc/ide/hdb/model file contains the string "DVD" with
some other text. I got around that using "grep 'DVD'" in a PROGRAM
field set. This is fine for *my* setup, but I want this thing to be
generic for optical
DJ Lucas wrote:
Okay, I need a bit of udev help. I want to write a rule to create a dvd
synlink. The /proc/ide/hdb/model file contains the string "DVD" with
some other text. I got around that using "grep 'DVD'" in a PROGRAM
field set. This is fine for *my* setup, but I want this thing to be
gen
19 matches
Mail list logo