Original Message
Subject: building LFS
From: Wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LFS Support List
Date: Freitag, 07. Dezember 2007 01:02:59
> Andreas Hofer wrote:
>> Original Message
>> Subject: building LFS
>> From: Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: LFS Su
Matthias Feichtinger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2007 01:59 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
>
>> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 12/05/07 18:42 CST:
>>
>>> That's a pretty good idea. It also might be nice if we placed a
>>> pointer back to the introduction text before the first package
>
Andreas Hofer wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: building LFS
> From: Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: LFS Support List
> Date: Donnerstag, 06. Dezember 2007 01:59:26
>
>
>>
> I don't agree. I had exactly the same problem and solved it more by
> guessing. But, may
An interesting response to what I found the way that I did it.
I suspect the cause is partly dyslexia and partly because I am a gui
refugee.
Please note that I have enjoyed the ordeal so far and I am certainly
learning some thing - thank you all for the efforts that have been put
into the projec
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 6:47 AM, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As I answered before, "I suppose". It just seems weird to redundantly
>> give information out because we feel that folks won't read the book,
>> so the information needs to be repeated over and over. However
martin welsh wrote:
~snip~
>
> As I have gone through the book I have tried to think of an elegant
> solution which will ensure that future readers do not make the mistakes
> that I have.
>
> The only solution I have thought of is to precede each chapter, the bit
> where the user starts typin
On Dec 6, 2007 6:47 AM, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Feichtinger wrote these words on 12/06/07 04:42 CST:
> >
> > Right.
> > But! If the question is asked again and again? Isn't that a hint for
> > improvement?
>
> As I answered before, "I suppose". It just seems weird to re
Philippe Delavalade wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 décembre à 15:48, Alan Lord a écrit :
>> martin welsh wrote:
>>> I am fumbling through and have now got to chapter 7 but not without some
>>> bother with the instructions.
>>> Early on you are told that you start by building the tools chain and
>>> should
Le jeudi 06 décembre à 15:48, Alan Lord a écrit :
> martin welsh wrote:
> > I am fumbling through and have now got to chapter 7 but not without some
> > bother with the instructions.
> > Early on you are told that you start by building the tools chain and
> > should start from $LFS/tools.
> > Nex
martin welsh wrote:
> I am fumbling through and have now got to chapter 7 but not without some
> bother with the instructions.
> Early on you are told that you start by building the tools chain and
> should start from $LFS/tools.
> Next - mkdir build file
> next - cd build file ok so far.
> Then
Matthias Feichtinger wrote these words on 12/06/07 04:42 CST:
>
> Right.
> But! If the question is asked again and again? Isn't that a hint for
> improvement?
As I answered before, "I suppose". It just seems weird to redundantly
give information out because we feel that folks won't read the book,
I am fumbling through and have now got to chapter 7 but not without some
bother with the instructions.
Early on you are told that you start by building the tools chain and
should start from $LFS/tools.
Next - mkdir build file
next - cd build file ok so far.
Then unpack source (to be built file)
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2007 01:59 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
>Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 12/05/07 18:42 CST:
>> That's a pretty good idea. It also might be nice if we placed a
>> pointer back to the introduction text before the first package
>> (binutils-pass1) since most people probably s
I skipped that section too initially. And I know how to do a "cd" and
more than that. Its all about losing attention and focus, and being
"fast on the trigger". Given that LFS takes time to build even when
automated, there should be no reason to skip reading the book :) Maybe
a warning sign saying
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 08:47 +0100, Andreas Hofer wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: building LFS
> From: Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: LFS Support List
> Date: Donnerstag, 06. Dezember 2007 01:59:26
>
> > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 12/05/07 18:42 CST:
>
Hi All,
I am trying to boot up 2.6.20-15 Kernel ( Ubuntu Kernel) using my
custom initramfs. But I am getting Kernel Panic when I boot using my
Init script. I am mentioning my init script below. I have followed the
FC7 init script, I really don't know many things which are being used in
that.
16 matches
Mail list logo