lists wrote:
Mark Olbert wrote:
This is probably a silly question, but I haven't been able to find an answer
in the mailing list archives.
If built on a dual-core system, does LFS take advantage of the dual cores?
If you enable the support in the kernel yes it does.
Jaqui
And if
XFCE is no longer supported in BLFS (and you didn't even specify its
version!).
There is some activity on the XFCE mailing list, but it is mostly about the
upcoming 4.6 release.
Any idea why XFCE is no longer supported in BLFS?
Richard
--
And if enabled, try this:
when building any package which takes a while to build, time how long it
takes to compile with
a) make
and
b) make -j 10
the second one should give you a speedy experience...
I have found that compiling big programs like linux kernel or glibc
works
Justin O'Neil wrote:
I guess what I'm trying to find out is why do I specifically have to
tell ld to link to ncurses?
You don't, if you followed the LFS book exactly. You must have missed
something. Do this...
echo 'main(){}' dummy.c
gcc dummy.c
readelf -l a.out | grep interpret
What output
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 1:08:53 am Mark Olbert wrote:
This is probably a silly question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer in the mailing list archives.
If built on a dual-core system, does LFS take advantage of the dual cores?
- Mark
if you compile a smp kernel it will.
--
