Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
* Does the community still want the LiveCD project? (Consider that a
couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS LiveCD by its nature is
degrading the quality of LFS)
* If so, is the community prepared to lend help in keeping it
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering how good is the job done by the specs commands in the
book. At first I compared the commands to the former specs patch. I
found that it did less than the patch. The commands didn't check for
files
Hi all,
I'm wondering how good is the job done by the specs commands in the
book. At first I compared the commands to the former specs patch. I
found that it did less than the patch. The commands didn't check for
files with the name 'gnu.h' and some header files in other
architectures like
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The command covers all the arches we currently support: x86 and x86_64
for Linux. We really don't need to be adjusting the default specs for
GNU mach. It definitely works, but you can fool around with it
yourself if you'd like.
