Russell Stockhammer wrote:
> For some reason the coreutils executables have linked to /lib/ld-linux.so.2.
> If I make a symlink of /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> everything in coreutils works perfectly. Now I suspect since glibc is the
> first thing to be built that this one sym
>
> You could also check the libraries:
>
> $ ldd /tools/bin/env
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
> libc.so.6 => /tools/lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e6e000)
> /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fbd000)
>
There we go!
# ldd /tools/bin/env
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x006cb000)
libc.so.6 => /l
Russell Stockhammer wrote:
>
>> What about 'ls /tools/bin'?
That looks OK. Does 'ls -l /tools; look like:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jul 16 10:59 /tools -> /mnt/lfs/tools
If that is OK, then I don't know what is wrong. The files programs env and
bash
are there. Of course you need to run chr
>
> What about 'ls /tools/bin'?
>
[ falsemkfifo stty
addr2line fgrepmknodsu
arfind more sum
asfmt mountsu-tool
Russell Stockhammer wrote:
>> What does 'echo $LFS' give you?
> /mnt/lfs
What about 'ls /tools/bin'?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> What does 'echo $LFS' give you?
>
/mnt/lfs
Russ
_
Looking for a place to rent, share or buy this winter? Find your next place
with Ninemsn property
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Edomain%2Ecom%2
Russell Stockhammer wrote:
> Gday everyone,
> I am at the stage where I am chroot'ing into the temporary LFS environment
> but I am having problems. If I run the command:
>
> chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
> PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbi
Russell Stockhammer wrote:
> Gday everyone,
>
> This may not be a LFS issue but I will ask here first since it
> happened with the LFS build.
>
> I am at the stage where I am chroot'ing into the temporary LFS
> environment but I am having problems. If I run the command:
>
> chroot "$LFS" /tools/
Gday everyone,
This may not be a LFS issue but I will ask here first since it happened with
the LFS build.
I am at the stage where I am chroot'ing into the temporary LFS environment but
I am having problems. If I run the command:
chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM
2009/7/16 Bruce Dubbs :
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> For a desktop, a
>> separate /home (and space reservedfor the _next_ LFS) also
>> simplifies subsequent rebuilds (although that can be awkward
>> if people want to share /home with distros).
>
> Why is it awkward? The only change needed is to make t
Ken Moffat wrote:
> For a desktop, a
> separate /home (and space reservedfor the _next_ LFS) also
> simplifies subsequent rebuilds (although that can be awkward
> if people want to share /home with distros).
Why is it awkward? The only change needed is to make the correct entry in
fstab. It's
2009/7/16 Richard Melville :
> Ken Moffat wrote:-
>
>> If /boot is a separate filesystem, you can use the version of grub
>> installed by your host system.
>
> I would always recommend a separate /boot partition whatever the build.
>
> Richard
> --
So would I, except on ppc's using yaboot. For a
Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
> But why is it using /lib/libc.so.6 (from the original distribution)
> instead of /lfs/tools/lib/libc.so.6?
>
>
> pvg
>
>
> Op 16-jul-09, om 16:11 heeft Justin P. Mattock het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
>>> I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Ap
But why is it using /lib/libc.so.6 (from the original distribution)
instead of /lfs/tools/lib/libc.so.6?
pvg
Op 16-jul-09, om 16:11 heeft Justin P. Mattock het volgende geschreven:
Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200
(indeed, an "old-world"
Ken Moffat wrote:-
> If /boot is a separate filesystem, you can use the version of grub
> installed by your host system.
I would always recommend a separate /boot partition whatever the build.
Richard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
Ken Moffat wrote:-
> If /boot is a separate filesystem, you can use the version of grub
> installed by your host system.
I would always recommend a separate /boot partition whatever the build.
Richard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
> I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200
> (indeed, an "old-world" Mac). I installed linux from the MkLinux
> distribution R1 (yes, a very old distribution) and then upgraded the
> system to Linux 2.6 from
> sources. I could not upgrade glibc wi
Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
> I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200
> (indeed, an "old-world" Mac). I installed linux from the MkLinux
> distribution R1 (yes, a very old distribution) and then upgraded the
> system to Linux 2.6 from
> sources. I could not upgrade glibc wi
I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200
(indeed, an "old-world" Mac). I installed linux from the MkLinux
distribution R1 (yes, a very old distribution) and then upgraded the
system to Linux 2.6 from sources. I could not upgrade glibc without
breaking the system, s
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Rajinder Yadav wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Rajinder Yadav wrote:
>>
>>> Can you be more specific? I am not sure what script you're taking
>>> about and I don't see a Section iv Host System Requirements? It is in
>>> LFS-SVN20090
20 matches
Mail list logo
