Re: gcc-4.3.2 fails to compile in chapter 6.14

2009-08-04 Thread Cornelia Böttge
Am Mittwoch 05 August 2009 04:23:59 schrieb Michael Tsang: > On Wednesday 05 August 2009 03:50:05 Cornelia Böttge wrote: > > My host-system is Debian etch. > > Until chapter 6.14 all went well, including the tests. > > But now during the compilation of gcc, I got the error "lib/cpp fails > > sanit

Re: LFS SVN, target option for x86_64 host

2009-08-04 Thread michael kapelko
I'm running on x86_64 host to build 32-bit LFS. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS SVN, target option for x86_64 host

2009-08-04 Thread Michael Tsang
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 07:53:27 michael kapelko wrote: > Hello. > For my host the $LFS_TGT is get assigned to x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu. > Assining target option of configure script yields $LFS_TGT-prog-name > program names instead of normal ones. > I also used flags CC="gcc -m32" and CXX="g++ -m32

Re: gcc-4.3.2 fails to compile in chapter 6.14

2009-08-04 Thread Michael Tsang
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 03:50:05 Cornelia Böttge wrote: > Hi all, > > this is my first try to build lfs, I use the current version of the book, > and did all according to the book (at least, I think I did). > My host-system is Debian etch. > Until chapter 6.14 all went well, including the tests

LFS SVN, target option for x86_64 host

2009-08-04 Thread michael kapelko
Hello. For my host the $LFS_TGT is get assigned to x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu. Assining target option of configure script yields $LFS_TGT-prog-name program names instead of normal ones. I also used flags CC="gcc -m32" and CXX="g++ -m32" to get 32-bit tools. Is this correct to get $LFS_TGT-prog-name pro

Re: Kenel Panic

2009-08-04 Thread Tobias Gasser
> check your bios setings and be shure to have it setup correct. sata must >> be native, not raid or whatever other options are available. ahci >> usually is only available in native mode. > > > This should be optional right? yes. > this is in case I want to use the AHCI drivers... am I correc

Re: Kenel Panic

2009-08-04 Thread RaptorX
Thank you so much guys for your help! I was able to boot my system for the first time. :D I just have to fix a minor glitch with my keymap, since for some reason I cannot type the letter "i" but i can type it with shift and caps, after that I will get prepared to follow up with BSLFS. Thanks agai

Re: Kenel Panic

2009-08-04 Thread RaptorX
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote: > > now, I have a SATA drive 250GB, and my usb of 4GB. Those are the two > > HardDrives that my pc should recognice. > > > CONFIG_SATA_PMP=y > > CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=y > > you probably don't have the right sata driver. > > the only one you're bui

Kenel Panic

2009-08-04 Thread Tobias Gasser
> now, I have a SATA drive 250GB, and my usb of 4GB. Those are the two > HardDrives that my pc should recognice. > CONFIG_SATA_PMP=y > CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=y you probably don't have the right sata driver. the only one you're building is the generic AHCI driver which supports most of the newer sata c

gcc-4.3.2 fails to compile in chapter 6.14

2009-08-04 Thread Cornelia Böttge
Hi all, this is my first try to build lfs, I use the current version of the book, and did all according to the book (at least, I think I did). My host-system is Debian etch. Until chapter 6.14 all went well, including the tests. But now during the compilation of gcc, I got the error "lib/cpp fail

Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-04 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Michael Tsang wrote: > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 14:06:59 Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> Michael Tsang wrote: >> >>> On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote: >>> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock: On x86_64, I use "pure64". But then, I'm happy to use lilo and I've

Re: Kenel Panic

2009-08-04 Thread RaptorX
here the attachment, i forgot to upload it grep.out Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Kenel Panic

2009-08-04 Thread RaptorX
> > Looking back at your fstab post to Bruce. Your root is listed as auto, > I've > > never used this before, have you had any luck with: > > /dev/sda4 / ext3 defaults1 1 > I just tried on my system with auto. Pretty cool. > > > I've attached a file with grep -i ata .con

Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-04 Thread Justin P. Mattock
I must have been tired or something, for some reason fdisk was not erasing the old partitions(even though they were gone, and had rebooted) and only reformatting the partition to the previous size that was supposed to be deleted. (under desperation ended up just using ubuntu to reformat the partit

Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-04 Thread Michael Tsang
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 14:06:59 Justin P. Mattock wrote: > Michael Tsang wrote: > > On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote: > >> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock: > >> On x86_64, I use "pure64". But then, I'm happy to use lilo and I've > >> no need of pre-built binaries. Certainly, bui