Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM, William Immendorf wrote: > Good point. I use Slax for my host system, it's a excelent livecd for > building LFS, BTW. And I know it uses AUFS. You said that you have to > modify the script slighly if the host system uses AUFS. So, what do I > have to do to the script

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, William Immendorf wrote: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM, William > Immendorf wrote: > > Good point. I use Slax for my host system, it's a excelent livecd for > > building LFS, BTW. And I know it uses AUFS. You said that you have to > > modify the script slighly if

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Smartboy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, William Immendorf > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM, William >> Immendorf wrote: >> > Good point. I use Slax for my host system, it's a excelent livecd for >> > building LFS, BTW. And I know it uses AUFS

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:02 AM, William Immendorf wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Smartboy wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, William Immendorf < > will.immend...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM, William > >> Immendorf wrote: > >> > Good point. I us

LFS v6.3: Section 6.9 - Glibc-2.5.1

Friends: I am in Section 6.9 (Glibc-2.5.1) of the LFS v6.3 manual and I am having trouble. The "make" command proceeded without error, but when I ran make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log I got the following error: make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: ***

Re: LFS v6.3: Section 6.9 - Glibc-2.5.1

On 9/7/2009 6:19 PM, Shawn Eary wrote: > Friends: > > I am in Section 6.9 (Glibc-2.5.1) of the LFS v6.3 manual and I am having > trouble. > > The "make" command proceeded without error, but when I ran > make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log > I got the following error: > make[2]: [/sources/glibc

Re: LFS v6.3: Section 6.9 - Glibc-2.5.1

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Shawn Eary wrote: > Friends: > > I am in Section 6.9 (Glibc-2.5.1) of the LFS v6.3 manual and I am having > trouble. > > The "make" command proceeded without error, but when I ran > make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log > I got the following error: > make[2]: [/so

Re: LFS v6.3: Section 6.9 - Glibc-2.5.1

Though, upgrading seamonkey to 1.1.17 should be wise. I wonder why the book has been stuck to 1.1.9 for so long, but I guess this matter should be discussed under the BLFS mailing list. Have a nice day. Dominic. On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Marcus Wanner wrote: > On 9/7/2009 6:19 PM, Shawn

LFS-6.5 Chapter 6.13 GMP-4.3.1

Compiling GMP on an Athlon Phenom II X810 using an i686 liveCD This is not what I wanted as I wanted to build an i686 system. What is in the book makes it compile like this: with march=k8 and mtune=k8 export ABI="32" ./configure --prefix=/usr --build=$CHOST --enable-cxx --enable-mpbsd I am goin

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Smartboy wrote: > Yes. You will have to look on the AUFS homepage (which, coincidentally, is > also a man page) to see exactly what commands to replace each with, but > functionally AUFS and UnionFS are the same, and so it requires minimal > editing. Good. I am start

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:53 PM, William Immendorf wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Smartboy wrote: > > Yes. You will have to look on the AUFS homepage (which, coincidentally, > is > > also a man page) to see exactly what commands to replace each with, but > > functionally AUFS and UnionFS

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Smartboy wrote: > Doesn't matter, really. You could do either. As long as the unionfs > directory is mounted, it shouldn't make much of a difference. K. I'm going to create the conf files in etc. But then, what about the symlinks? What about them? William -- http:/

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:56 AM, William Immendorf wrote: > K. I'm going to create the conf files in etc. But then, what about the > symlinks? What about them? I mean the temporary symlinks. Oh, and BTW, is it OK to create the required-for-boot symlinks when the UnionFS package is mounted? William

Re: Just curious about the pkg-unionfs hint:

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:02 PM, William Immendorf wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:56 AM, William > Immendorf wrote: > > K. I'm going to create the conf files in etc. But then, what about the > > symlinks? What about them? > I mean the temporary symlinks. Oh, and BTW, is it OK to create the > req

zlib instructions - 'rm /lib/libz.so'?

hi, I'm just wondering, what's the purpose of moving the symlink in '/lib/libz.so', and creating a '/usr/lib/libz.so' instead? FHS compliance? LSB compliance? just because '/usr/lib' is first in the search path before '/lib'? -jf -- In the meantime, here is your PSA: "It's so hard to write a grap

GCC Compilation

Hello. The book makes a first compilation of gcc http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html But after making a second compilation: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-pass2.html My question is whether the first and the second should be th

Re: GCC Compilation

On 09/08/2009 12:42 AM, Gustavo Eli wrote: > Hello. > > The book makes a first compilation of gcc > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html > > But after making a second compilation: > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-pass2.html > >