On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:01:55 -0800 (PST), brown wrap
wrote:
> Yes, I found the command to make that partition ext3 and that worked. I
> didn't know I had to build it into the kernel. I figured if ext3 came up,
> ext2 would.
Nope. Ext2, 3, and 4 are related, but they're not the same thing, nor
int
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:48:51 +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Is it possible to enable ext3 support without ext2?
Certainly is. They likely share some common code, but they're presented as
two unrelated options in the menus.
Simon.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: h
On 2/23/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> linux fan wrote:
>> Is it just me, or why does bootscripts no longer create setclock link
>> /etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/S25setclock ?
>
> It was removed about nine months ago because it is set by udev.
... supposed to be set by udev ...
But why, on my new LFS-6.5 syste
linux fan wrote:
> Is it just me, or why does bootscripts no longer create setclock link
> /etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/S25setclock ?
It was removed about nine months ago because it is set by udev.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
Is it just me, or why does bootscripts no longer create setclock link
/etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/S25setclock ?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Marco Marzetta
wrote:
>
> Hi, I finished building LFS. Now looking through the manual I find BLFS to
> section 6.3 to install GCC version 4.1.2, but in reality GCC is already
> installed with LFS in paragraph 6.15 and in a version 4.4.1. Why should I
> install t
> >> Is your keyboard direct connect, or through a hub?
> The latter has
> >> also been known to cause problems with several
> versions of the kernel,
> >> so I strongly suggest you not to use a hub with a
> keyboard or mouse.
> >>
> >> Mike
When you say hub, do you mean an external hub? No, I d
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:04:07 -0800 (PST), Marco Marzetta
wrote:
> Hi, I finished building LFS. Now
> looking through the manual I find BLFS to section 6.3 to install GCC
> version 4.1.2, but in reality GCC is already installed with LFS in
> paragraph 6.15 and in a version 4.4.1. Why should I inst
> Is it possible to enable ext3 support without ext2?
> Did you create the ext2 partition under Centos? Does it
> have some sort of extended
> attributes/selinux type modifications? I've had a similar
> problem in the past with
> a reiserfs partition that I created under Ubunut that I
> couldn't m
Le Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:04:07 -0800 (PST),
Marco Marzetta a écrit :
> Hi, I finished building LFS. Now
> looking through the manual I find BLFS to section 6.3 to install GCC
> version 4.1.2, but in reality GCC is already installed with LFS in
> paragraph 6.15 and in a version 4.4.1. Why should I i
On 23 February 2010 14:04, Marco Marzetta wrote:
>
> Hi, I finished building LFS. Now looking through the manual I find BLFS to
> section 6.3 to install GCC version 4.1.2, but in reality GCC is already
> installed with LFS in paragraph 6.15 and in a version 4.4.1. Why should I
> install twice t
On 23 February 2010 10:17, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:34:45 +, Ken Moffat
>
> wrote:
>> Any suggestions for something that's easy to build (no 'cmake',
>> please), and can play .flv video files from stdin ?
>
> I'm afraid I can't provide specifics, but I'd be surprised if gs
Hi, I finished building LFS. Now
looking through the manual I find BLFS to section 6.3 to install GCC
version 4.1.2, but in reality GCC is already installed with LFS in
paragraph 6.15 and in a version 4.4.1. Why should I install twice the same
package?! What is this mess?!
--
http://linu
On 2/23/10, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Do you source /etc/profile in ~/.bashrc?
Not the perfect answer, but it led to the answer.
Actually, /etc/bashrc should be sourced in ~/.bashrc and it was,
but I had missed creating /etc/bashrc in "The Bash Shell Startup Files",
and /etc/bashrc:
" # Provides pro
Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:58:56 -0500, Baho Utot
> wrote:
>
>> Yikes.my hand done builds and my now scripts/Makefile/Build system
>> worked so far!
>>
>> On i686 or x86_64 platform..
>>
>> I want to boot this from a USB thumb drive.
>> Any pointers on what I need to s
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> Did you enable ext2 support when building the kernel? If not, there's your
> problem.
If you want to find the ext2 support option, when you run make
menuconfig, go to the menu labeled "File Systems", and the first
option you'll see is "Second e
On 23/02/10 10:06, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:00:15 -0800 (PST), brown wrap
>> I have a filesystem that won't mount under LFS. It mounts under Centos
> and
>> contains all of my sources. When I try to mount it, I get unknown
>> filesystem. I can mount the root filesystem which is e
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:58:56 -0500, Baho Utot
wrote:
> Yikes.my hand done builds and my now scripts/Makefile/Build system
> worked so far!
>
> On i686 or x86_64 platform..
>
> I want to boot this from a USB thumb drive.
> Any pointers on what I need to set?
Since you're booting off USB
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:00:15 -0800 (PST), brown wrap
> I have a filesystem that won't mount under LFS. It mounts under Centos
and
> contains all of my sources. When I try to mount it, I get unknown
> filesystem. I can mount the root filesystem which is ext3, but not this
> one:
Did you enable ext
stosss wrote:
>> KNOPPIX is built from Debian, and Debian is known to have problems with
>> USB keyboards, the last time I used it.
>>
>> Is your keyboard direct connect, or through a hub? The latter has
>> also been known to cause problems with several versions of the kernel,
>> so I strongly sugg
20 matches
Mail list logo
