gcc "make" ... no go

Simon Geard wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:40 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii. > > Just a reminder, Bruce - pages are only numbered on the page itself, not > in the table of contents. Referring to the "Host System Requirements"

gcc "make" ... no go

Simon Geard wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:40 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii. > > Just a reminder, Bruce - pages are only numbered on the page itself, not > in the table of contents. Referring to the "Host System Requirements

make mrproper

moving on to 5.6. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers in gcc-build directory ... $make mrproper make: *** No rule to make target `mrproper'. Stop. tried same command in gcc-4.5.1 & sources & tools & /mnt/lfs directories ... same error -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: htt

make mrproper

search-engining about a bit ... seems I need to tar the linux source ... which did moved into the resulting /mnt/lfs/source/linux-2.6.36.1 directory $make mrproper ran without error is that the correct procedure? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.lin

patch

from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory $patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch yields: patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 45. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c.rej patching file sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sys

Re: make mrproper

On 25/11/10 09:58, robert wrote: > search-engining about a bit ... seems I need to tar the linux source ... > which did > > moved into the resulting /mnt/lfs/source/linux-2.6.36.1 directory > > $make mrproper > > ran without error > > is that the correct procedure? > For *every* package in ch

hello all

I'm chinese who use linux as desktop operating system. when i try to compile some software (such as VLC, Gedit,and so on),there is always come out error tips. It tells here and there needs some lib files .But, where can i find these lib files ? In which package? Thank you! -- http://linuxfromscra

Re: Recommended LiveCD?

No recommendations? :( On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Someone Somebody wrote: > I'm looking for a more clear recommendation, since I'm using this under a > VM it's quite low on memory (I give it a 512M ram+2G swap on my 2G ram > system), and as such I need a light LiveCD, and can you please li

Re: Recommended LiveCD?

Hi Why not install a minimal debian system? I always build on debian... Regards André Am 25.11.2010 11:35, schrieb Someone Somebody: > No recommendations? :( > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Someone Somebody > wrote: > > I'm looking for a more clear recommen

Re: Recommended LiveCD?

Am Thursday 25 November 2010 11:35:24 schrieb Someone Somebody: > No recommendations? :( Yes of course! It's German and much more actual than any other here. And you could build it by yourself too. Jst go to serlfservix.de and have a look at molli :-) -- Der Versand unsignierter und unverschlüs

Re: Recommended LiveCD?

I don't speak german... I'd rather something in English Thanks anyhow. On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Matthias Feichtinger wrote: > Am Thursday 25 November 2010 11:35:24 schrieb Someone Somebody: > > No recommendations? :( > > Yes of course! > It's German and much more actual than any other her

Re: hello all

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 06:32:06PM +0800, David Young wrote: > I'm chinese who use linux as desktop operating system. when i try to compile > some software (such as VLC, Gedit,and so on),there is always come out error > tips. It tells here and there needs some lib files .But, where can i find > th

Re: patch

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:11 AM, robert wrote: > from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory > $patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch I really don't mean to offend you, but that is very stupid. Patching a package with a patch meant for another package, that is a pretty idiotic act. The solution

Re: patch

William, Stupid or ignorant? In any case, simply mis-pasted the file name. I don't suppose it's stupid to spell the word "actually" as "acually" or idiotic to spell the word "just" as "jujst" as you did in your reply. Your reply "that did not mean to be offensive"? My mis-paste was neither st

Re: patch

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:11:57AM -0600, robert wrote: > from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory > $patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch > > yields: > patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 45. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > nptl/sysdeps/

Re: patch

Mike Hollis wrote these words on 11/25/10 09:33 CST: > You are in the wrong directory . You are trying to apply a glibc patch > to the Linux kernel. You should be in the unpacked glibc directory. > I don't think you understand the fundamentals of the install procedure > and a grasp of this is ne

Re: patch

Mike Hollis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:11:57AM -0600, robert wrote: >> from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory >> $patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch >> >> yields: >> patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 45. >> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rej

Re: hello all

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:32:06 +0800 David Young wrote: > I'm chinese who use linux as desktop operating system. when i try to compile > some software (such as VLC, Gedit,and so on),there is always come out error > tips. It tells here and there needs some lib files .But, where can i find > these l

Re: patch

robert wrote: > I have a fairly good "beginner's" grasp of the compile/build procedure. > And yes, I refer often to 5.3. Until you get the hang of things, I suggest having three windows open. 1. Browser at the bottom of Section 5.3. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/g

Re: patch

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:58:37AM -0600, robert wrote: > > > Thanks, Mike. Just a mis-pasted error. I caught it, corrected it, and > now proceed along my way. > > And thanks too for the respectful suggestion. > > I have a fairly good "beginner's" grasp of the compile/build procedure. > A

Re: patch

Bruce Dubbs wrote: > robert wrote: > >> I have a fairly good "beginner's" grasp of the compile/build procedure. >> And yes, I refer often to 5.3. > > Until you get the hang of things, I suggest having three windows open. > > 1. Browser at the bottom of Section 5.3. > http://www.linuxfromscra

Klogd segfault

Hi all, Not sure wether this post should go to this list or the lfs-dev list. It touches both lists i think. The issue was klogd segfaulting at 46 during boot and manual start/restart. The first time it apeared to me was while building lfs-6.7 (after being away from lfs since version 6.2) using

lastlog string

I just noticed that the printing of lastlog after login : Last login: Thu Nov 25 14:42:51 -0500 2010 on /dev/tty4 I thought this used to include the username . I poked around in the code for Shadow to see if I could decipher the origon of this string but got lost in a jungle of includes,stucture

OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64

Hi was anyone able to build OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64? My problem is seamonkey-1.1.14 wont build (same error as in http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/3168) I tried to fix the makefile, and the build actually continues and a little later it complains about not having a target to build l

Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64

On Thursday 25 November 2010 23:11:03 Andre Keller wrote: > Hi > > was anyone able to build OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64? > > My problem is seamonkey-1.1.14 wont build (same error as in > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/3168) > I tried to fix the makefile, and the build actually contin

Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64

Hi Thank you... I gave it another try with your settings still the same problem... I did now remove the libmsgbsutl_s.a part from smime extension build makefile and seamonkey did build correctly so far... Lets hope the rest does too. I'll keep you posted... Am 26.11.2010 01:55, schrieb luxInte

Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64

Am 26.11.2010 02:04, schrieb Andre Keller: > Hi > > > Thank you... I gave it another try with your settings still the same > problem... I did now remove the libmsgbsutl_s.a part from smime > extension build makefile and seamonkey did build correctly so far... > Lets hope the rest does too. > > I'll

Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64

Am 26.11.2010 02:53, schrieb Andre Keller: > I'll wait for the next thing to break now... g > There it is... cppu will not build against gcc > 4.4 adjust ../cppu/inc/uno/lbnames.h accordingly... then cppu will build... *Onwards!* -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs

Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Andre Keller wrote: > Am 26.11.2010 02:53, schrieb Andre Keller: >> I'll wait for the next thing to break now... g >> > > > There it is... cppu will not build against gcc > 4.4 > > adjust ../cppu/inc/uno/lbnames.h accordingly... then cppu will build... > >

Re: Recommended LiveCD?

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Someone Somebody wrote: > I don't speak german... > I'd rather something in English > Thanks anyhow. > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Matthias Feichtinger > wrote: >> >> Am Thursday 25 November 2010 11:35:24 schrieb Someone Somebody: >> > No recommendations? :

Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64

On 11/25/2010 08:19 PM, Stuart Stegall wrote: >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> > > I was able to make libreoffice-3.2.99.3 build on current SVN x86. BLFS will be moving to LibreOffice in the near future. Hopefully 3.3 comes out soon, if not we'll have to use the 3.2.1 build from b