On 09/05/2012 11:26 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 08/24/2012 10:35 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
I am going to update that
Hi;
I try to compile glibc-2.16 version. But I'm getting following error when I
execute make command:
/opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/gethnamaddr.c:636:
more undefined references to `__stack_chk_guard' follow
I configured all lfs user variable or path in my personal user.
Path and $LFS_TGT is set correctly.
Can you tell me more about that patch??
i did all steps actually as instructed in manual book.
finally what is my problem???
On Sep 6, 2012 10:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a modified build as I have added pacman package management to the
build which have have some impact on this error.
Anyway I needed to add
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} -ludev-local.a make -f udev-lfs-188/Makefile.lfs
to get udev to compile as gcc/ld failed to link udev-local.a
I will let you
I have successfully built, installed and ran LFS-7.2 on i686 and x_86_64
platforms pretty much using the books instructions. The only changes
were very small to incorporate a package manager, nothing major.
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to
I've noticed that this was recommended way back on LFS 3.3 but now seems to
have been dropped. As all the distros appear to have caught up with LFS by
having this symlink what are the current views here on creating it? I've
noticed some discussion on the dev list in January but it seems to have
Baho Utot wrote:
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a is supposed to be included in executables directly as
an archive, not searched as a library.
-- Bruce
--
Richard Melville wrote:
I've noticed that this was recommended way back on LFS 3.3 but now seems to
have been dropped. As all the distros appear to have caught up with LFS by
having this symlink what are the current views here on creating it? I've
noticed some discussion on the dev list in
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 16:52:49 Eleanore Boyd wrote:
By the way, since you have never had any good answers on here, and
have
never bothered to have a nice attitude on here, don't bother replying.
The server wouldn't take it if you tried.
Hi Elly,
I have been following here some
On Sep 6, 2012 8:44 PM, Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers edgaralw...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 16:52:49 Eleanore Boyd wrote:
By the way, since you have never had any good answers on here, and
have
never bothered to have a nice attitude on here, don't bother replying.
The server
On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a is supposed to be included in executables directly as
an archive,
Baho Utot wrote:
On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a is supposed to be included in executables
On 09/06/2012 04:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a is
On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
checking for MPFR... no
configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
static vs shared).
make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble]
Baho Utot schrieb:
I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me.
so you just had very very much luck on your way...
there are packages which CAN fail with parallel builds.
whenever i run into a problem, i just restart the package with -j1 which
often solved the
15 matches
Mail list logo
