Hi All
Having built quite a few LFS systems with great success I have now
decided I would like to compile a highly optimized build. I would
therefore be grateful if anybody would be able to give me advice on the
following optimization strings.
My system is a home grown 3.4 GHz Pentium4 (Prescott)
"
Or am I missing something?
Many Thanks
Athena
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy
McMurchy
Sent: 10 February 2007 19:06
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: GCC Optimization
Athena P wrote these words on 02/10/07 13:04 CST:
> And,
Many Thanks to everyone which replied to my original post, after reading
lots of your comments I get the feeling that most of you disagree with
optimization. To be honest that's cool; however I still believe that
some optimization, specifically the architectural stuff has still got to
be worth try
Hello
I come from the BSD world, particular FreeBSD and haven't played with
Linux for quite some time so please excuse me if this is a really stupid
question.
I seem to remember ages and ages ago when I was upgrading an old
slackware box from libc5 to glibc2. I had to tar in
linuxthreads-{glibc-v
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Nicholson
Sent: 15 February 2007 20:33
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: Linuxthreads!
On 2/15/07, Athena P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just wondering why this has not been included
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
Moffat
Sent: 10 February 2007 20:22
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: GCC Optimization
>(iii) Impact on your processor's caches - a bigger binary increases
>the pressure on your caches, and may mean mo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Moffat
Sent: 16 February 2007 01:07
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: GCC Optimization
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 12:15:27AM -, Athena P wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
