On Saturday 19 October 2013 01:55:57 Esben Stien wrote:
> Esben Stien writes:
> > I'm trying to make my cursor a solid red block..
>
> Nobody has any idea or any pointers?
KDE4 -> system settings -> workspace appearence -> cursor Theme ???
--
Dr.-Ing. Edga
t;
unquote
I used it. You do not need a PC with EFI support, however, your kernel must
have " EFI GUID partition table support" compiled in. And you will need GPT (
GUID partition tables ).
Good luck,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
ge was "cannot find PARTUUID=blah". But the booting was OK after
introducing the initramfs.
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
er I introduced an initramfs, the
job was done.
So far, I solved my problem. I do not see dificulties using an initramfs. But
perhaps somebody may explain this behaviour.
Again, thank you very much,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfr
dev rules defined up to now related to partitions or to the
boot procesws itself !
Thank you very much,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ix this, but it excludes also the gdisk activities.
Thanks in advance,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
is enabled in the kernel.
Is enabled
>
BTW., what means "WLAN Interface unavailaible" ? nm-applet is showing me the
same data for wlan0 as the udev-rule "70-persistent-net.rules". So not
availaible can only mean "already in use by someone" or "no permission
hat is the reason for
supplicant. You are right, your instructions are OK for a communication.
However, Dave wanted to use WICD, what gives more elasticity in running in
different places with different encryptions. I hope, I am not wrong. To my
experience, WICD is a great tool.
Edgar
--
Dr.
NS. This requires PRINTIP="yes".
PRINTALL="no"
-
ONBOOT="no" is needed to be able to start WICD
The last two scripts taken, slighty modifyed, from the BLFS Book.
I hope these notes will help you in some way to put your wifi connection to
work.
issue if you need
advice. I am working with WICD and DHCP.
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
s not the right way to handle this issue. We
have to learn also to deal with uneasy comments, with patience. I do
not like at all the Alice in the Wonderland method: "heads off".
Consider it.
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
---
The driver "evdev" is not mentioned, neither in Xorg.0.log nor in dmesg.
Thank you very much for all your help,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
o make
links for all of them. I wonder, if the book instruction to install phonon in
$QTDIR is so lucky and if it would not be better to install in $KDE4DIR instead
?
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ
vel-aleph0/specs/libiodbc.spec
Regards,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
l release included in the book. (development )
Again, thank you very much, extended to Stuart and to Linux Fan for their
comments !
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi Bruce,
I know, this issue is a "little" the field of BLFS. I am trying to get xorg
working, a not to difficult task in former times. Now, testing the
xorg.conf.new, I get a screen, with a dirty "X" on it, but no way to close it
again. strg-alt-backspace is ignored, also the mouse. Cold rebo
Hi,
accidentaly I removed protocol.txt from /usr/lib/xorg. I do not know for what
this file is needed and how to rebuild it. Rebuilding xorg server perhaps ?
Thanks in advance for a hint.
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. EdgarAlwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://w
s also interesting for me, as I had not done it before.
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
s, I did it twice, as I feared maybe to have forgotten to install after make.
It was not a major problem, as I could provide the files to gcc. But something
seems to be a little misplaced in gcc's makefiles ?
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/li
you might want to check it ?
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:46:26 +0200
"Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers" wrote:
I would like to make a little report in between.
At first, I realized, that the kernel of my host system was supporting ext4
file systems but not ext2 and ext3. As grub.cfg asks for ext2, I thought, this
could be
In this case, set root would not be neccessary, as my statement
linux (hd0,6)/boot/lfskernel-2.6.34 root=/dev/sda6 rw
would do the job.
In my case - I am not excluding errors from my part-, I got, as I wrote, an
error message "not an assigment"
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar A
Much more, as I crashed my box during this efforts and had to do a
big lot of work until I repaired it. Could it be, that grub2 is not already
mature enough, and distros are still waiting ?
Regards,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-sup
ect ?
> >
> Indeed, which is why I suggested you try something like:
( sophisticated, for non english natives: "indeed", does it mind "it is not
correct" ? or does it mind it is ? ;-) )
>
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
mounted on /mnt/lfs and you want to use ext4:
>
I think I will give it a try. I cannot understand the behaviour of my grub2 (
version 1.98 ), besides that the ext4 partition is corrupted. I will report.
Thank you very much for your help
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linu
a dd. What would you suggest ?
Thanks for your assistance,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
intending to enter the ext4 partition. Other partitions
on both disks are booted normaly.
>
> ISTR grub's ext2 handles ext3, and might not need an insmod.
>
I tryed also insmod ext2 and insmod ext3.
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:50:34 -0400
linux fan wrote:
> This one said kernel must have ext4 support.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/01/msg00190.html
As I wrote, my kernel was build with ext4 support ;-)
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/m
2.6.34
I did not find anything googling.
Thanks in advance,
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:23:02 -0400
Chris Staub wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 01:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
> >
> >> 2.) the configuration file example given talks about "Be careful not
> >> to change the 'exec tail' line a
s missing in the example ?
Thanks a lot for comments.
Edgar
--
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
31 matches
Mail list logo
