On 11/23/2012 12:47 PM, Olivier Desbiens wrote:
> Ken Moffat ntlworld.com> writes:
>
>> No, not at all normal - in 7.2 we don't patch gcc.
>>
>> /tools/lib/crti.o comes from glibc. Did you run the sanity check
>> after installing glibc ?
>>
>> You are also using /tools-7.2 - perhaps something
On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Paige Thompson wrote:
> For sure, its good to find some of those errors though.. for me it helps to
> know what you can't do with some stuff first hand as a means of saying I am
> proficient in something and sometimes it takes going down tha
ever knew and on the other I can imagine
myself having a lot more fun with what I have planned once I get inside the
chroot :)
On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 05:38:05PM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
>> No intention of keeping em secret just wan
to do.. when im pretty sure about what i
want and yeah will check out some other lists i think... prob would make more
sense.
Thxziz
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
Ken Moffat wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:49:37PM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
>> It could ALSO be th
, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:35:13PM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
> What does an ldd of a tools/bin/as look like for you?
>
After pass 1, no idea. And after pass 2 I would only be able to tell you
after I chrooted - assuming I hadn't deleted /tools which I normally do soon
after the system
, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:34:00AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
> - I'm not looking for fewer unusual problems, I want to learn how this works
> and figure out what's going on so I can solve these problems on my own.
>
Stage one: follow what others have done, and attempt to underst
, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:34:00AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
> - I'm not looking for fewer unusual problems, I want to learn how this works
> and figure out what's going on so I can solve these problems on my own.
>
Stage one: follow what others have done, and attempt to underst
] still doesnt work right (after binutils pass 2)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:13:03AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
> I don't understand.
>
> commit ee9247c38a8def24a59eb5cfb7196a98bef8cfdc
>
> Author: Carlos O'Donell
>
> Date: Sat Jun 30 08:27:06 2012 -0700
>
&
pass 2)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:38:45AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
> dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/bin $ strace ./as
>
> execve("./as", ["./as"], [/* 28 vars */]) = 0
>
> brk(0) = 0x1432000
>
> mma
ml
how is it that it thinks I have glib 2.7, that commit is what my glibc tree
is at. so .
From: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Paige
Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:39 AM
To: 'LFS Support List
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/bin $ strace ./as
execve("./as", ["./as"], [/* 28 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x1432000
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f59289d4000
access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = -1 ENOE
so what about compiling the rest of the stuff am I supposed to be using the
host compiler or the 2nd pass built gcc for that?
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Paige Thompson wrote:
> thats what I thought you were supposed to do but for some reason I thought
> that was a bad idea
>
&g
thats what I thought you were supposed to do but for some reason I thought that
was a bad idea
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:11:23AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
>> aha,
>>
>> once again,
>>
>> dev@dev-Virt
$i}' >>
$CWD/compiled.list && true) || (echo "compile failed in `pwd`" ; false)) || exit
make install
) || exit
seems like --prefix would have implied that
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Paige Thompson wrote:
> thank you for your response!
>
> sorry if I
r 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/ncurses/progs'
make: *** [all] Error 2
not real sure what to make of it but I'm sure I'll figure it out eventually if
nobody here knows.. it's been an interesting learning experience if nothing
else :)
On Nov 14,
ecause for whatever reason config.guess doesn't work on the second pass of
binutils.
then I guess once I have everything else built I should be able to chroot into
it in theory but we'll see, I have a feeling its going to be a huge waste of
time.
On Nov 14, 201
failfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfail
make[2]: Entering directory
`/mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/gcc-build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc'
# If this is the top-level multilib, build all the other
# multilibs.
DEFINES='' HEADERS='../../.
ools/bin \
/tools/bin/bash --login +h
On Nov 14, 2012, at 12:22 AM, Paige Thompson wrote:
> I found a quick fix for my problem,
>
> dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/x86_64-linux-gnu/bin $ ls
> a.out ar as gcc ld ld.bfd nm objcopy objdump ranlib strip
>
> I
.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7fde0e011000)
/tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(0x7fde0e5e8000)
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/bin $
doesn't really look right, nfc what to do about it. *shrug*
On Nov 14, 2012,
hahahahah, thats funny, right as this email arrived I was trying to figure out
the following (pass 2 of binutils):
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/binutils-build $ make -C ld
LIB_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib
make: Entering directory `/src/binutils-build/ld'make all-recursivemake[1]:
Entering
20 matches
Mail list logo
