Alan Lord wrote:
Tor Olav Stava wrote:
I've been struggling with Firefox for a few days now, and could
really need some pointers. I've followed the instructions in BLFS,
and the compile went fine without any errors, but when I'm trying to
start Firefox it gives me this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
marco van der grient wrote:
Hi there,
My name is Marco and I am probaly switchinng from Slackware to lfs.
There is just one problem using jhalf: it seeks for gcc 4.0.3, nut it
does not exist on the server... Is this a typo? And shout it be 4.0.2?
I'm using jhalf 0.2 from svn... Does anyone
JiMi VO wrote:
hello world!
im a newbie so please help. im using FC3, im having 5 partition on the same
HDD, im buidling LFS on hda1
now end of ch5 i would like to ghost the hda1 onto hda2 so that i can go on
ch6 and if anything wrong i can just return to hda2 (where end of ch5 is
ghosted).
i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried removing the binutils-build directory and unpacked the sources. Tried
this a number of times, but still get the same error.
System:
Intel 233MMX
80Mb RAM
2.6Gb HDD
Debian Sarge (Kernel: 2.6.8-2)
Just an idea..
I once tried to build on a similar
daniel wrote:
good day,
i'd reached ch 6 aftet executing the chroot command string in that page, got
result that chroot was not able to run the command /toos/bin/env.
The chroot command string was run as root.
I remember I've also got that error some time ago, and as far as my
memory goes
Just want to ask before I try this monster compile.
Will this version compile with the same instructions and patches that's
in the current SVN book?
If I remember correctly, compiling OOo-2.0.0rc3 took about 16 hours, so
it would be nice to know if it's a waste of time ;)
Are there any plans
.
Aside from that, thanks for the excellent work! I've been waiting for
this, as it's very time consuming to edit all the profiles manually. ;)
Tor Olav Stava
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
have any critical production
system running here, in which case I would definately not recommend any
SVN version.
Thanks, for any help or comments !
Your welcome :)
Hope it helps, and good luck on you journey
Tor Olav Stava
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
it safe. I'm working on gaining
that knowledge, so I guess I'll be ready in about ten years time.. ;)
Tor Olav Stava
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
friends and so forth.. :)
May the source be with you.
Tor Olav Stava
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
actually linked to. If that's me, and it don't give
the correct output according to the instructions in LFS, I would
definately start over again, and double check everything I've done..
So let's hope it's just the typo ;)
Good luck!
Tor Olav Stava
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
Ian wrote:
Hi,
Hello :)
I have a number of 486 machines. They have very little memory
16M or less. My interest is to make a version of Linux to
run a few programs on these, particularly the mail program
Mutt and Midnight Commander; no X stuff. I need to keep
well below 100M drive space.
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Henry Grefrath wrote:
Hi Tony,
I was hoping I could build a small system on this laptop. It has 32MB
of RAM and I setup a 75MB swap partition. The rest of the hard disk
1.2GB is mounted as /mnt/lfs.
I think you might struggle with that, I'm afraid. Building just
On all my LFS/BLFS builds, the nfs-server script seems to be a little
buggy. There's always an 80 second delay when shutting down, and it
always return [FAIL] even if the nfsd processes are actually killed.
I've tried a few solutions from the BLFS-dev list.
in the stop section, I changed
Luca Dionisi wrote:
Hi Tor
Have anyone out there been using the More Control and Package Management
using Package Users (v1.1) with the latest LFS-SVN's?
I've got a _similar_ problem with list_package.
I'm using LFS 6.1 Stable.
At the beginning it was doing fine. From a certain
Findutils or Man, but basically I have no idea, and
haven't been able to sort anything useful out of the Changelogs.
Some of the funtions in that list_package script is way above me, so if
anyone have a fix for this problem I would be very grateful.
Tor Olav Stava
--
http
to check the mentioned hint and Cross-LFS as I go,
and do my best to incorporate the commands there.
I would really appreciate if you could report on your success and/or
failures on this subject.
Sincerely
Tor Olav Stava
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
Rainer Peter Feller wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 11:13 +0200, Tor Olav Stava wrote:
Rainer Peter Feller wrote:
what about the uname kernel hack?
I have modyfied the old (2.4.x) source to work with 2.6.x
(see arrachment)
I've already started the build, just replacing
Good morning/noon/evening my fellow LFS'rs,
Good morning to u too :)
I was hoping that someone might be able to help me out wih the
following problem:
I was working on my second LFS installation (6.1) (the first one
(5.x) went flawlessly) and have chosen to use the user package
system.
19 matches
Mail list logo