Happy EASTER !
Just a small note that the check will fail on the ping localhost test if
IPv6 is not configured on the base system. This shouldn't actually be a
FAIL but a WARNING. But I guess that's for the maintainer to change :)
Regards,
D.
--
Heya,
the patch for glibc in Chapter 6 is missing in the tar package as well
as in the download links. Had to download it through the book, Chapter
3.
Regards,
Daniel
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 15:41 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
loki wrote:
the patch for glibc in Chapter 6 is missing in the tar package as well
as in the download links.
I see that it is missing in the tarball, but which download link are you
referring to?
It does appear to be missing
Hey all,
unfortunatly you can't find much heartbleed bug info on the net for
administrators. So I will try my luck here.
I have some https websites and a openvpn server. My questions are:
1.) Is it enough for me to recompile only OpenSSL or do I have to
recompile OpenSSH, apache, OpenVPN?
2.)
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:28 -0700, Golam Md. Shibly wrote:
cd /etc/sysconfig/
cat ifconfig.eth0 EOF
ONBOOT=yes
IFACE=eth0
#SERVICE=ipv4-static
#IP=192.168.1.1
#GATEWAY=192.168.1.2
#PREFIX=24
#BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
EOF
What are the SERVICES of ifconfig.eth0 but ip4-static for ppp?
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 23:18 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:49:29PM +0100, loki wrote:
Kernel is 2.6.35.3.
For the future, you _might_ want to think about using a
long-term-supported stable kernel (at the moment, 3.10), or even
updating your kernel once or twice
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:56 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
This may help:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/files/updating-lfs.html
-- Bruce
Yup. It did. Thanks. That is a procedure that I was thinking about. I
will try to combine your procedure and the hints from William and will
Heya all.
Need some help. I have an old lfs installation which is in production
use, for the past 5-6 years. I guess it's version 6.3 or something since
it has kernel 2.6 on it. It is time to install a new version on it. But
there are the following problems:
1.) Since it is in production it
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 09:06 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
If your running kernel is up to at least 2.6.32 then default glibc
configure options will work. If it is less than 2.6.32, then you'll
need to adjust the glibc configure commands otherwise you will get
FATAL: Kernel too old
Heya,
just wanted to ask what happened to CLFS?
On the address http://www.cross-lfs.org/ I'm getting a Domain for Sale.
Regards,
Daniel
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 16:16 +0100, loki wrote:
...
This gets me to the point that it starts the kernel, finds sda,
sdb,. states that it Failed to execute /init,
sh: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropiate ioctl for
device
sh: no job control in this shell
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 14:31 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
Don't optimize the bootloader. Grub doesn't need optimizations. No
bootloader needs optimization from gcc. You are dealing, also, with
assmebly that the authors write for the target platform. Segfaults
commonly come from grub
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 09:24 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
Are you trying to do this on a UEFI system?
Dan
Nope. I'm not even sure that this old rig is EFI capable :) And secondly
I'm too lazy to learn it since for the servers that I use 4 primary
partitions is the most I'm going to use and
My first guess would be that you didn't get out of chroot with the
command logout.
Now that we have said that, lets move on to booting our shiny new LFS
installation for the first time! First exit from the chroot
environment:
logout
My second guess would be that your using
dev wan0 proto kernel scope link src
121.211.212.123
Thx...
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 19:34 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
loki wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 15:53 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I think I see what you mean. What happens if we add a new variable to
the ifconfig script
Heya,
following error came up when I compiled the kernel:
LD arch/x86/built-in.o
CC kernel/fork.o
CC kernel/exec_domain.o
CC kernel/panic.o
CC kernel/printk.o
CC kernel/cpu.o
CC kernel/exit.o
CC kernel/itimer.o
HZFILE
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 10:01 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 17/07/2013 09:51, loki a écrit :
[...]
But this brings the question, should bc be migrated from BLFS to LFS since
sometimes
it is needed for the kernel compilation in Chapter 8.3.
Regards,
Daniel
It has been
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 22:05 +0200, loki wrote:
Heya,
am having binutils test problems. I thought that it was the same as
the problem I had in April with memory and the swap size. But this
time it is something different. The setup is simillar Pentium 4 and
512MB.
Any ideas?
Heya
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 15:53 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I think I see what you mean. What happens if we add a new variable to
the ifconfig script:
STATIC_GATEWAY=10.0.5.5
and change GATEWAY to STATIC_GATEWAY in the ipv4-static-route script?
Sounds good. Will try that as soon as I
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 10:54 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I can't look at this for a few days, but I'll try to get to it over the
week end.
-- Bruce
OK. I'm in the process of preparing a new server with LFS 7.3. Also a
complicated network scenario. Should be finished on Sunday so if
Heya,
am having binutils test problems. I thought that it was the same as the
problem I had in April with memory and the swap size. But this time it
is something different. The setup is simillar Pentium 4 and 512MB.
Any ideas?
../as-new -o dump.o
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:03 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Thx for the reply.
The changes were made to support bridging in April 2012. If you just
comment out the GATEWAY entry in /etc/sysconfig/ifconfig.dev, wouldn't
that do what you want?
Nope. Then it wouldn't set up a route. For
Heya all,
wanted just to point to a small bug in the network boot scripts.
(/sbin/ifup; /sbin/ifdown; /lib/lsb/ipv4-static; /lib/lsb/ipv4-static-route;
/etc/init.d/network )
For simple network setups it isn't a problem but for complex route
setups it is. The problem is in /sbin/ifup.
The
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:38 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I took a look and the file you want is
binutils-build/gas/testsuite/gas.log. I can't reproduce your failure,
so you need to look. What I have is:
Have the same problem.
Here's the relevant part:
PASS: i386 space1
../as-new -o
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 14:55 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
gcc uses a lot of space. Allocate about 2G of swap and it should be OK,
but slow.
-- Bruce
Working. THX...
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Heya,
wanted just to give my two cents regarding the new
sysconfig/ifconfig.eth# methodolgy.
With the old one (network-devices directory) I had the possibility to
put more then one option for one ethernet card (for instance one ip
address and two static routes within 3 files). With the new
...and a rootkit was installed.
A very interesting story. I'm interested how a regular user was able to
install a rootkit. I realize that you may not know.
Didn't have the time to analyse that but I presume through privilege
escalation.
Cause this user had direct access to the running
Heya,
First this is not a support request but a live story from someone
using LFS heavily in real life situations and servers and why I would
choose LFS before any distribution based server.
Let me introduce myself. Im into LFS since version number 3 - 4.
Can't remember exactly anymore. A lot
Hello,
has anyone tried lfs 6.7 on a 64bit platform. I had great problems
with some packages from BLFS after I installed LFS 6.7. And during
the compile of 6.7 I had some problems but somehow I circumvented them.
And the system ran. But when I tried to compile Open-Office 3.2.1,
mysql 5.1.45,
29 matches
Mail list logo
