Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-20 Thread Simon Geard
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:54 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: LFS doesn't use it. BLFS depends on who edited the page, and when. We used not to use it, but then some of us were persuaded that it would be in the new standard. Me, I like it, others don't. Your system, your rules. My personal

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-20 Thread Alice Wonder
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 21:59 +1200, Simon Geard wrote: On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:54 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: LFS doesn't use it. BLFS depends on who edited the page, and when. We used not to use it, but then some of us were persuaded that it would be in the new standard. Me, I like it,

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-19 Thread Simon Geard
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 23:49 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: One thing to note is that there are several of these programs created and used by udev that are in /lib/udev, not the /usr hierarchy at all. That's a product of the whole separate /usr argument, isn't it? Simon. --

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: Hi, Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS is to not use /usr/libexec ?? I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's what has been adopted or not. Thanks LFS

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-19 Thread Baho Utot
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: Hi, Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS is to not use /usr/libexec ?? I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's what has

[lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Alice Wonder
Hi, Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS is to not use /usr/libexec ?? I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's what has been adopted or not. Thanks -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Armin K.
On 04/19/2013 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Hi, Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS is to not use /usr/libexec ?? I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's what has been adopted or not. Thanks It's not yet part of the

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Alice Wonder
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 06:00 +0200, Armin K. wrote: On 04/19/2013 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Hi, Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS is to not use /usr/libexec ?? I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's what has been

Re: [lfs-support] /usr/libexec

2013-04-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alice Wonder wrote: Hi, Am I correctly understanding that the filesystem philosophy of LFS/BLFS is to not use /usr/libexec ?? I don't need an explanation as to why, I just want to know if that's what has been adopted or not. We have generally avoided it, but I'm not sure we should. At one