On 09/06/2012 04:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a is supp
Baho Utot wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>
>>> I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
>>> -ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
>> Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
>> build/udev-local.a is supposed to be included in exec
On 09/06/2012 03:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
>> -ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
> Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
> build/udev-local.a is supposed to be included in executables directly as
> an a
Baho Utot wrote:
> I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
> -ludev-local.a to LDFLAGS.
Can you go into detail about why you found this needed.
build/udev-local.a is supposed to be included in executables directly as
an archive, not searched as a library.
-- Bruce
-
I have successfully built, installed and ran LFS-7.2 on i686 and x_86_64
platforms pretty much using the books instructions. The only changes
were very small to incorporate a package manager, nothing major.
I only thing I had a problem on was udev in which I had to add
-ludev-local.a to LDFLA
I have a modified build as I have added pacman package management to the
build which have have some impact on this error.
Anyway I needed to add
LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -ludev-local.a" make -f udev-lfs-188/Makefile.lfs
to get udev to compile as gcc/ld failed to link udev-local.a
I will let you kn
