Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i486 option now?
--
ante wrote:
> Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
> relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
> I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
> during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> ante wrote:
>> Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
>> relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
>> I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAG
ante wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> ante wrote:
>>> Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
>>> relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
>>> I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> It was added 09/15/07. See
>
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2018
>
Thank you.
--
ante
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above i
