Since I get a "command not found" type error, I assume not, but I have
to ask:
1) is the "at" command installed in any of the LFS packages?
2) Or, is there some other command that provides the same functionality?
(start some job/batch file at a given time)
3) Finally, if not part of LFS, can
On 6/01/2012 2:59 PM, David Gay wrote:
> Since I get a "command not found" type error, I assume not, but I have
> to ask:
>
> 1) is the "at" command installed in any of the LFS packages?
>
> 2) Or, is there some other command that provides the same functionality?
>(start some job/batch file at
David Gay wrote:
> Since I get a "command not found" type error, I assume not, but I have
> to ask:
>
> 1) is the "at" command installed in any of the LFS packages?
Not presently. It is mentioned in Section iv. LFS and Standards.
> 2) Or, is there some other command that provides the same func
>>On 6/01/2012 2:59 PM, David Gay wrote:
>> Since I get a "command not found" type error, I assume not, but I have
>> to ask:
>>
>> 1) is the "at" command installed in any of the LFS packages?
>>
>> 2) Or, is there some other command that provides the same functionality?
>> (start some job/batch fi
On 6/01/2012 9:40 PM, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote:
>>> On 6/01/2012 2:59 PM, David Gay wrote:
>>> Since I get a "command not found" type error, I assume not, but I have
>>> to ask:
>>>
>>> 1) is the "at" command installed in any of the LFS packages?
>>>
>>> 2) Or, is there some other command that
- Original Messages - (merged)
>>Since I get a "command not found" type error, I assume not, but I have to ask:
>> 1) is the "at" command installed in any of the LFS packages?
>
>Not presently. It is mentioned in Section iv. LFS and Standards.
>
>> 2) Or, is there some other command th
