On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 14:23 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
There's no information on the site, no source code, mailing lists - just
a couple of paragraphs grumbling about dbus, and a claim that it'll be
released some
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 20:16 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
Ok. I know about skabus, but it's not clear whether it will be able to
function as drop-in replacement for dbus. I would love to get rid of
dbus completelly.
There's no information on the site, no source code, mailing lists - just
a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
There's no information on the site, no source code, mailing lists - just
a couple of paragraphs grumbling about dbus, and a claim that it'll be
released some time last year or this one. Looks like vapourware to me -
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 14:47 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard,
Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus?
There are none - if something
Jorge Almeida wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard,
Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to
use okular (although I hate its
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:35 PM, TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com wrote:
Jorge Almeida wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, I misled you. I don't have one right now, but I'm thinking of using
this when it's released.
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com:
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard.
Viceversa,
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com:
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard.
Viceversa,
sorry for typo. :-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote:
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com:
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have
Armin K. wrote:
On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote:
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com:
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard,
Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to
use okular (although I hate its terminal-spamming) and I believe
TheOldFellow wrote:
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is
being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd
compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
You may find
14 matches
Mail list logo