On Sep 17, 2012, at 18:37 PM, lx wrote:
> By the way, I use the Ubuntu 10.10 as the host system, which will
> affect the LFS installation?
Only if you don't meet the host system requirements. Mostly.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
F
lx wrote:
> 2012/9/18 lx
>
>> That's fine. We all have to learn. However, as others have said, it's
>>> time to start over with LFS-7.2. It's much more difficult to help you
>>> if you are using an out-of-date version.
>>> Thank you, I think I will do it over again by LFS-BOOK.7.2.
>>
>>
> By t
2012/9/18 lx
> That's fine. We all have to learn. However, as others have said, it's
>> time to start over with LFS-7.2. It's much more difficult to help you
>> if you are using an out-of-date version.
>>
>>-- Bruce
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you, I think I will do it over again by LFS-BOOK.7.2.
>
> That's fine. We all have to learn. However, as others have said, it's
> time to start over with LFS-7.2. It's much more difficult to help you
> if you are using an out-of-date version.
>
>-- Bruce
>
>
>
>
> Thank you, I think I will do it over again by LFS-BOOK.7.2.
--
http://linuxfromsc
--- Em dom, 16/9/12, lx escreveu:
De: lx
>Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] the result of " ldd libz.so.1 " is right ?
>Para: "LFS Support List"
>Data: Domingo, 16 de Setembro de 2012, 21:14
>Hello:
> I have checked " ls -
lx wrote:
> I have checked " ls -l libz* " in the directory of "
> /mnt/lfs/tools/lib ", and
> the result is:
> " ls: cannot access libz*: No such file or directory"
> So, this is the place I made mistake. But I just built the packets
> in chapter5 of
> LFS-BOOK-7.1.I think I s
2012/9/17 Ken Moffat
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:06:13PM -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > As Bruce wrote, you should use 7.2, the more recent release version.
> >
> I agree that there is now no point in building 7.1, but I think it
> will be more useful to the OP if he *first* checks
--- Em dom, 16/9/12, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] the result of " ldd libz.so.1 " is right ?
> Para: "LFS Support List"
> Data: Domingo, 16 de Setembro de 2012, 19:47
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:06:13PM
> -0700, Fernand
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:06:13PM -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> As Bruce wrote, you should use 7.2, the more recent release version.
>
I agree that there is now no point in building 7.1, but I think it
will be more useful to the OP if he *first* checks what he has done in
7.1 (I'm with
linux.so.2 , so i'm confused.
>
> this is the whole process.
>
>
> 2012/9/16 Fernando de Oliveira <mailto:fam...@yahoo.com.br>>
>
> --- Em dom, 16/9/12, lx escreveu:
>
> Don't top post.
>
> >
> > De: lx
> &
On Sep 16, 2012, at 07:36 AM, lx wrote:
> thank you,
> I'm using 7.1. and it's a 32-bit system.
>
> maybe i don't make problem clear. when I make the file-5.10. it can't
> find ldd libz.so.1 . so I check the libz.so.1 by "ldd libz.so.1",
> and result is:
>
> linux-gate.so.1 => (
.
>
> >
> > De: lx
> > Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] the result of " ldd libz.so.1 " is right ?
> > Para: "LFS Support List"
> > Data: Domingo, 16 de Setembro de 2012, 1:25
> >
> > thank you very much.
> > when i exec " ldd li
--- Em dom, 16/9/12, lx escreveu:
Don't top post.
>
> De: lx
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] the result of " ldd libz.so.1 " is right ?
> Para: "LFS Support List"
> Data: Domingo, 16 de Setembro de 2012, 1:25
>
> thank you very much.
> when i exec &q
thank you very much.
when i exec " ldd libz.so.1", the result is:
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x008e2000)
libc.so.6 => /tools/lib/libc.so.6 (0x0013b000)
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x003e4000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /mnt/lfs/tools... maybe this is right?
the problem is that i make the file-5.10 i
Don't post in html. It makes the message hard to read.
lx wrote:
> hello:
> i encounter a problem.
What problem?
so i check " ldd libz.so.1 " in */lib*, and
> the result is:
>
> *linux-gate.so.1 => (0x0046)*
> * **libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x008bb000)*
> * **/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (
hello:
i encounter a problem. so i check " ldd libz.so.1 " in */lib*, and
the result is:
*linux-gate.so.1 => (0x0046)*
* **libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x008bb000)*
* **/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00825000)*
the result is right or not ?
and i have adjusted the Toolchain by :
*SPECS=`dirna
16 matches
Mail list logo
