Hello lfs'ers,
I've just joined the list and, though I've seen this question asked in the
archives, I did not find an answer that I could turn into a fix. I'm
building with Version 7.0-rc2, I've gotten to step 6.7, and followed,
carefully, all steps, verbatim, leading to this (three times - just
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:50:05 -0700
Don Burns wrote:
> Hello lfs'ers,
>
> I've just joined the list and, though I've seen this question asked in the
> archives, I did not find an answer that I could turn into a fix. I'm
> building with Version 7.0-rc2, I've gotten to step 6.7, and followed,
> ca
Thanks for your reply, Andrew. ld seems to be fine:
root:/# ldd /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00dcc000)
libdl.so.2 => /tools/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00ca4000)
libc.so.6 => /tools/lib/libc.so.6 (0x0067e000)
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00e09000)
ld, in fact seems to run:
root:/
Update:
After attempting to debug the problem, and finding that I had no symbols
(because the executables are stripped), I went back and redid everything
from scratch for a fourth time (I'm getting good at this), but this time
skipped the strip step (5.34), in order to see if I had a _start symbol
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 17:31 -0700, Don Burns wrote:
> I went back and redid everything from scratch for a fourth time (I'm
> getting good at this),
Don't worry... that's not at all unusual. I'd be surprised if there were
many people who managed to go through the entire book on their first
attempt,
