On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/02/10 04:06, Simon Geard wrote:
With a by-the-book LFS setup, /tmp is a tmpfs mount - an in-memory
filesystem that's thrown away on shutdown/reboot.
That's news to me. Maybe I've not been keeping up.
Where in the
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:11 +, Andrew Benton wrote:
On 14/02/10 04:06, Simon Geard wrote:
With a by-the-book LFS setup, /tmp is a tmpfs mount - an in-memory
filesystem that's thrown away on shutdown/reboot.
That's news to me. Maybe I've not been keeping up.
Where in the book does it
stosss wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Mike McCarty
mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
[...]
I think that a general maintenace helper guide, or even a
section in the book relating to that, giving considerations
which enter into philosophy of maintenance and how to go
about keeping a
Mike McCarty schrieb:
[...]
I have studied the recommended layout (I can't recall what it's
called, now)
Maybe FHS?
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
Cheers,
Jan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Jan-Christoph Bornschlegel wrote:
Mike McCarty schrieb:
[...]
I have studied the recommended layout (I can't recall what it's
called, now)
Maybe FHS?
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
Yes, that's it!
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 14:04 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
partitions. Like, /var, /tmp, /usr/local, /home are all
good candidates for being separate partitions. I like
for /tmp to be in a separate partition from /home, so
a user program which fills up /home/some-user/... doesn't
make /tmp also
brown wrap wrote:
Let me start over and maybe I can make things clear. I built the LFS
using Centos 5.4, running with the old GRUB. Here is my system
layout:
/dev/sda has Centos with its swap being the 2nd partiton. /dev/sdb I
use to download files and store things.
/dev/sdc is two
A little more. I didn't list the size of the disks because I didn't think it
was important, but since the legacy GRUB may not be able to handle them:
sda is small, I am not at the machine until Sunday or Monday.
sdb is one TB that I just store stuff on.
sdc is the disk with LFS on it. It is
brown wrap wrote:
A little more. I didn't list the size of the disks because I didn't
think it was important, but since the legacy GRUB may not be able to
handle them:
sda is small, I am not at the machine until Sunday or Monday.
sdb is one TB that I just store stuff on.
sdc is the
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 20:48 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
IMO, 750G is way too big for an LFS partition.
Well, not *too* big, in the sense of causing problems. Unnecessarily
big might be a better wording, and I'd agree.
Separating data from applications is practically a necessity when it
comes to
installed a ZFS
filesystem on the first partition and I'd hate to get rid of it, but I can.
Anyway, I can't do anything with it right now. I'm not near the machine.
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
From: Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz
Subject: Re: Booting problems again
brown wrap wrote:
I wanted to install LFS on a fresh partition and this was the only
unused SATA drive I had. I had small IDE drives, but this computer
doesn't have an IDE interface. And when it comes to cost now $40 gets
you double this size. I could repartition the drive, but I am trying
to
12 matches
Mail list logo
