Re: LFS build OS

2006-07-01 Thread Michael
The most "official" one would be the LFS livecd, but most Linuxes with a 2.6 kernel should work. Stay away from Mandriva. Slackware is what I'm using. If you have a 64-bit processor, try Slamd64. Note that the instructions will be slightly different, though. On 6/29/06, Ross Cameron <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: LFS build OS

2006-06-29 Thread Vladimir A. Pavlov
> any linux is a build os. I think any linux with _the kernel 2.6.x_ if you use one of the latest books (development or stable-6.1.1) > I'd like to start playing with it with the minimum of hassle and > effort, I don't mind swapping host OS's. Try LFS LiveCD. -- Nothing but perfection pv -- h

Re: LFS build OS

2006-06-29 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 6/29/06, Ross Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there,.. whats the "official" if there is... build distro for LFS? There isn't. Supposedly the build should bootstrap from any distro supplying the development tools mentioned in Host Requirements. This is not always the case, though, and

Re: LFS build OS

2006-06-29 Thread Jaqui Greenlees
--- Ross Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there,.. whats the "official" if there is... > build distro for LFS? > > I'd like to start playing with it with the minimum > of hassle and effort, > I don't mind swapping host OS's. > > Regards > Ross > -- any linux is a build os. for simplest

LFS build OS

2006-06-29 Thread Ross Cameron
Hi there,.. whats the "official" if there is... build distro for LFS? I'd like to start playing with it with the minimum of hassle and effort, I don't mind swapping host OS's. Regards Ross -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.