Eric Stout wrote these words on 03/17/08 11:25 CST:
> They also use the 386 cpu on the space shuttle because they know the code
> base inside and out, and it's incredibly pysically stable.
Yes, they use the 386 CPU on the shuttle, but not for the reasons
you state.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips
> I'm cross-compiling Linux for a 386. If you just scoffed at reading
> that, then let me tell you that (1) of all the purported "i386"
> distros not a single one runs on a real 386 (caveats galore - see Q4),
> and (2) the questions have more to do with glibc, NPTL, an
I'm cross-compiling Linux for a 386. If you just scoffed at reading
that, then let me tell you that (1) of all the purported "i386"
distros not a single one runs on a real 386 (caveats galore - see Q4),
and (2) the questions have more to do with glibc, NPTL, and
LinuxThreads than
On 2/15/07, Athena P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Many thanks Dan - think u have answered my question!
I should mention that it is actually still possible to build
linuxthreads if you need it for compatibility with old binaries or
something. I think most of the big distros instal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Nicholson
Sent: 15 February 2007 20:33
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: Linuxthreads!
On 2/15/07, Athena P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just wondering why this has not been included
Right. I don't know if linuxthreads is even supported on newer
glibc's. NPTL (Native Posix Threads Library) is the standard threading
library for glibc. libcrypt has been included in the tree for a while,
too. Here's what my slightly older libc says:
$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Libr
Hello
I come from the BSD world, particular FreeBSD and haven't played with
Linux for quite some time so please excuse me if this is a really stupid
question.
I seem to remember ages and ages ago when I was upgrading an old
slackware box from libc5 to glibc2. I had to tar in
linuxthreads-{
