Thomas Tutone wrote:
>
> --- On Mon, 7/20/09, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>
>> Something to do with the file magic
>>
>> Justin P. Mattock
>>
>
>
> Thanks. magic is a directory, rather than a file, and comes straight out of
> the tarball, so I don't think that helps much. Or am I misun
--- On Mon, 7/20/09, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> Something to do with the file magic
>
> Justin P. Mattock
Thanks. magic is a directory, rather than a file, and comes straight out of
the tarball, so I don't think that helps much. Or am I misunderstanding you?
Could you expand on your co
Thomas Tutone wrote:
> --- On Sun, 7/19/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>
>> Two things:
>>
>> 1. We don't need the full compile log. Just
>> send the last part where the error
>> occurred. Looking at successful compiles is a waste
>> of time and space.
>>
>
> Sorry about that. I guess I wa
--- On Sun, 7/19/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Two things:
>
> 1. We don't need the full compile log. Just
> send the last part where the error
> occurred. Looking at successful compiles is a waste
> of time and space.
Sorry about that. I guess I wanted to provide all necessary context, but
o
Thomas Tutone wrote:
> I'm having a strange problem trying to compile file-4.26 (LFS 6.4, chapter
> 6.33). It appears to get through most of the compile, but then near the end
> dies with a mysterious "lt-file: No current entry for continuation". I've
> built LFS 6.4 several times before on other
I'm having a strange problem trying to compile file-4.26 (LFS 6.4, chapter
6.33). It appears to get through most of the compile, but then near the end
dies with a mysterious "lt-file: No current entry for continuation". I've
built LFS 6.4 several times before on other computers without proble
