--- On Tue, 11/17/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, I thought I
> would get individual messages back to my inbox. Now I know they come
> back bundled up in Digests (can I change this in any way?)
It shouldn't be that way. You are not signed up in digest mode. If you are
usi
Lapohos Tibor wrote:
> Thank you Bruce, Aleksandar. Sorry for the late reply, I thought I
> would get individual messages back to my inbox. Now I know they come
> back bundled up in Digests (can I change this in any way?)
It shouldn't be that way. You are not signed up in digest mode. If you
ar
Lapohos Tibor wrote:
[...]
> Bruce wrote:
>> Yes, you are wrong. The reason for the cross compile is to completely
>> isolate the current host from the new system.
>
> OK, but is that not what we do in the LFS 6.4 or 6.5 as well? I am not trying
> to argue, just to better understand. In both
Thank you Bruce, Aleksandar. Sorry for the late reply, I thought I would get
individual messages back to my inbox. Now I know they come back bundled up in
Digests (can I change this in any way?)
>> 1) For now, I am booting off the x86_64 lsflivecd, and I am following
>> the CLFS way to build a
>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:32:03 -0500
>Chris Staub wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2009 04:54 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> > First off, I understand that in newer versions of LFS book, the
> > build process changed, so that GCC and binutils are built together.
> > I still use the old method, in which binutils
On 11/14/2009 04:54 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> First off, I understand that in newer versions of LFS book, the build
> process changed, so that GCC and binutils are built together. I still
> use the old method, in which binutils and GCC are build separately.
> This is reflected in this e-mail,
>On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:54:49 +0100
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> If you opt for a 64-bit only, however, the stock LFS commands should
> do the trick (I myself use ones from CLFS-1.0.0-x86_64-64, adapted
> for my versions of packages/patches).
>
> [snip]
>
> Hope I was helpful. :)
>
First off, I understand that in newer versions of LFS book, the build
process changed, so that GCC and binutils are built together. I still
use the old method, in which binutils and GCC are build separately.
This is reflected in this e-mail, so don't let that confuse you.
>On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:5
Lapohos Tibor wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I the the 6.4 book thourgh, and it worked out very nicely. Now I need
> a 64 bit version. I am aware that the support for 64 bit systems is
> only about to come in a future release of LFS, but I would like to
> give it a shot somehow, since that is what I need
Hello All,
I the the 6.4 book thourgh, and it worked out very nicely. Now I need a 64 bit
version. I am aware that the support for 64 bit systems is only about to come
in a future release of LFS, but I would like to give it a shot somehow, since
that is what I need. In order to do this, one ne
10 matches
Mail list logo
