On 10/20/10, Mike Hollis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:18:26PM -0400, linux fan wrote:
>> Sometimes I try the 20-second fix-all:
>> Shutdown.
>> Turn off all power to all hardware.
>> After 20 seconds, power-up and boot.
>> --
>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
>> FA
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:18:26PM -0400, linux fan wrote:
> Sometimes I try the 20-second fix-all:
> Shutdown.
> Turn off all power to all hardware.
> After 20 seconds, power-up and boot.
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/fa
Sometimes I try the 20-second fix-all:
Shutdown.
Turn off all power to all hardware.
After 20 seconds, power-up and boot.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi.
>
> >
> > Well, the untarred files have timestamps of months ago, when the
> developers
> > made the package. Even untarring with -m and getting the current time
> makes
> > no difference. But I can post the part where it repeats:
>
> The untarred timestamps are irrelevant. It is the make targ
Also, not forgetting to remove any previously unpacked glibc sources
and glibc-build directories before unpacking with tar.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 10/15/10, Alberto Hernando wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Well, the untarred files have timestamps of months ago, when the developers
> made the package. Even untarring with -m and getting the current time makes
> no difference. But I can post the part where it repeats:
The untarred timestamps are irrelevan
Hi.
Well, the untarred files have timestamps of months ago, when the developers
made the package. Even untarring with -m and getting the current time makes
no difference. But I can post the part where it repeats:
make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1/nptl'
make[4]: Entering directory
>On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:59:02 +0200
>Alberto Hernando wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I've put the instructions from the book in a script:
>
> baratito:~# cat chroot_lfs.sh
> #!/bin/bash
>
> LFS="/media/lfs"
> MAKEFLAGS="-j 2"
> mount -v --bind /dev $LFS/dev
> mount -vt devpts devpts $LFS/dev/pts
> mount -v
Hi.
I've put the instructions from the book in a script:
baratito:~# cat chroot_lfs.sh
#!/bin/bash
LFS="/media/lfs"
MAKEFLAGS="-j 2"
mount -v --bind /dev $LFS/dev
mount -vt devpts devpts $LFS/dev/pts
mount -vt tmpfs shm $LFS/dev/shm
mount -vt proc proc $LFS/proc
mount -vt sysfs sysfs $LFS/sys
c
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Alberto Hernando wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm building lfs-6.7, and I'm stuck compiling glibc in the chroot. I have
> had it running for over 24 hours, and make isn't complete yet. I don't want
> to stop it because there is no error, but I copied the lfs folder to another
>On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:57:30 +0200
>Alberto Hernando wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm building lfs-6.7, and I'm stuck compiling glibc in the chroot. I
> have had it running for over 24 hours, and make isn't complete yet. I
> don't want to stop it because there is no error, but I copied the lfs
> folder to
Hi.
I'm building lfs-6.7, and I'm stuck compiling glibc in the chroot. I have
had it running for over 24 hours, and make isn't complete yet. I don't want
to stop it because there is no error, but I copied the lfs folder to another
point and started another building. Same result. Make is all the ti
12 matches
Mail list logo
