Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-09-08 Thread Pol Vangheluwe
Op 6-aug-09, om 13:32 heeft Pol Vangheluwe het volgende geschreven: How I solved this problem: My host system (an Apple PowerPC 7200 running linux-2.6, but with glibc-2.1.3) has not the required version glibc-2.2.5. When making gcc, pass-2, the newly built /lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/ li

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-08-06 Thread Pol Vangheluwe
Op 20-jul-09, om 11:22 heeft Pol Vangheluwe het volgende geschreven: I just do this for fun: it is a nice challenge trying to install an up-to-date linux on a 13-year old machine (if I really need Linux, then I use Darwin on my iMac). I removed the Pentium PCI processor card, added memory,

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-20 Thread Pol Vangheluwe
Op 18-jul-09, om 23:26 heeft Ken Moffat het volgende geschreven: 2009/7/18 Justin P. Mattock : Pol Vangheluwe wrote: So far, I didn't consider using a newer version then the one used in the LFS book (it takes about 30 hours to perform a bootstrap build of gcc on my poor 100Mhz PowerPC 601

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-18 Thread Ken Moffat
2009/7/18 Justin P. Mattock : > Pol Vangheluwe wrote: >> So far, I didn't consider using a newer version then the one used in >> the LFS book (it takes about 30 hours to perform a bootstrap build of >> gcc on my poor 100Mhz PowerPC 601…) > 30 hours(sh^t) that's too long. No, PPC has generally be

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-18 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Justin P. Mattock wrote: > > [Lots o fdeleted stuff] > > >> 30 hours(sh^t) that's too long.. >> As for 6.4 I can't even find that one, >> I ended up following this: >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/ >> there you have libc 2.10, gcc 4.4.*(seems more up

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Justin P. Mattock wrote: [Lots o fdeleted stuff] > 30 hours(sh^t) that's too long.. > As for 6.4 I can't even find that one, > I ended up following this: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/ > there you have libc 2.10, gcc 4.4.*(seems more up-to-date, > but don't let that deter

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-18 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > I try to follow the LFS 4.6 book as closely as possible. I had to > apply the following deviations: > - the host system has glibc-2.1.3 instead of the recommended > glibc-2.2.5. I broke several times my system, by trying to upgrade > glibc. Then I gave up and turned to

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-18 Thread Pol Vangheluwe
I try to follow the LFS 4.6 book as closely as possible. I had to apply the following deviations: - the host system has glibc-2.1.3 instead of the recommended glibc-2.2.5. I broke several times my system, by trying to upgrade glibc. Then I gave up and turned to LFS. - replaced /usr/bin by

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-18 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > I was maybe not clear enough: I am not yet at chapter 6. I am doing > section 5.12, so no chrooting in the game. > > I have some doubts about the manipulation of the > specs file in section 5.8. Nothing changed when I view with -dumpspecs: > lfs:/lfs/sources/bash-3.2$ gc

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-18 Thread Pol Vangheluwe
I was maybe not clear enough: I am not yet at chapter 6. I am doing section 5.12, so no chrooting in the game. I have some doubts about the manipulation of the specs file in section 5.8. Nothing changed when I view with -dumpspecs: lfs:/lfs/sources/bash-3.2$ gcc -dumpspecs | grep ld.so.1 -

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-16 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > But why is it using /lib/libc.so.6 (from the original distribution) > instead of /lfs/tools/lib/libc.so.6? > > > pvg > > > Op 16-jul-09, om 16:11 heeft Justin P. Mattock het volgende geschreven: > >> Pol Vangheluwe wrote: >>> I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Ap

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-16 Thread Pol Vangheluwe
But why is it using /lib/libc.so.6 (from the original distribution) instead of /lfs/tools/lib/libc.so.6? pvg Op 16-jul-09, om 16:11 heeft Justin P. Mattock het volgende geschreven: Pol Vangheluwe wrote: I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200 (indeed, an "old-world"

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-16 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200 > (indeed, an "old-world" Mac). I installed linux from the MkLinux > distribution R1 (yes, a very old distribution) and then upgraded the > system to Linux 2.6 from > sources. I could not upgrade glibc wi

Re: pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-16 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200 > (indeed, an "old-world" Mac). I installed linux from the MkLinux > distribution R1 (yes, a very old distribution) and then upgraded the > system to Linux 2.6 from > sources. I could not upgrade glibc wi

pass 2 build of gcc-3.4.2 has a problem with libgcc_s.so.1

2009-07-16 Thread Pol Vangheluwe
I am trying to install LFS, edition 6.4 on an Apple PowerPC 7200 (indeed, an "old-world" Mac). I installed linux from the MkLinux distribution R1 (yes, a very old distribution) and then upgraded the system to Linux 2.6 from sources. I could not upgrade glibc without breaking the system, s