hello community,
i just want to report about successful build of lfs system with new
gcc-4.3.0 for those who might be interesred.
i still don't know how it all will go on with blfs stuff, but for the
moment i have basic multilib x86-64 system with gpm, alsa & midnight
commander, and everything wor
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:26:32 +0300
cunnilinux himself <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> since gcc-4.3.0 requires gpm & mpfr libraries
i meant gmp not gpm, that's a typo, sorry
--
sex, freeride, open source!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 08:26:32PM +0300, cunnilinux himself wrote:
>
> so, if you want to test new shiny gcc yourself, you can try :)
>
This is the 4.3.0 that caused all the noise on lkml recently, over
whether there was a vulnerability (signal handling, for applications
compiled with gcc-4.3.0
2008/3/30, cunnilinux himself <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hello community,
> i just want to report about successful build of lfs system with new
> gcc-4.3.0 for those who might be interesred.
>
> i still don't know how it all will go on with blfs stuff, but for the
> moment i have basic multilib x86
> This is the 4.3.0 that caused all the noise on lkml recently, over
> whether there was a vulnerability (signal handling, for applications
> compiled with gcc-4.3.0 running on current linux kernels), and if it
> was down to gcc devs or kernel devs to fix it.
oops! :-0 never heard about that
