4. Jan 2016 02:32 by paulgrog...@fastmail.fm:
> Just checking, this *looks* OK, but it's different than the book.
> Book says:
> If everything is working correctly, there should be no errors, and the
> output of the last command will be of the form:
>
> [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/li
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: LFS Support List
> Sent: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 01:58:00 +0100 (CET)
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Unexpected test failed when building automake for
> LFS-7.8.
>
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:01:32PM +0100, lilian.pfis...@free.fr wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Finally, my third
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 16:22 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
>
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Which error message do you get when executing those lines for dropping ssh
> attempts after 6 hits?
>
> Have you upgraded your kernel recently? Many issues with iptables can be from
> a incorrect kernel config
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 16:42 -0600, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> Have you taken a look at:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Simple_stateful_firewall
Hi,
yup tried that. The same error msg.
Regards,
Daniel
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
On Sun, January 3, 2016 21:30, Daniel M. wrote:
>
>
> Heya and a Happy New Year !!!
>
> Might be that I'm wrong here but I know that there are some ppl here who
> could know the answer to this.
>
> I have the following iptables setup:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m conntrack --ctstate
I am trying to build LFS-7.8 on a Pentium 4
32-bit system. I am using LFS-7.6 as the
host or starting system. I get as far as
section 6.9.1, the installation of Glibc-2.22.
I have tried building it twice. The first
time I followed the instructions in the
stable LFS-7.8 book, and after the 'make'
c
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 19:05 +, William Harrington wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> I looked at your config settings and conntrack is in the kernel for ipv4.
> I would look at your command:
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m recent
> --set
>
> --set needs some mor
> > This CentOS 6.6 is the only x86-64 system I have. The alternative
> > would be CLFS from an i686 LFS-7.2 system.
>
> Well, why not use a live CD? My first LFS was built on a Windows box
> (yes, many of us started there) running a live CD version of Knoppix.
There are any number of ways that
On Mon, January 4, 2016 21:58, Daniel M. wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 19:05 +, William Harrington wrote:
>
>
>> Hello Daniel,
>>
>> I looked at your config settings and conntrack is in the kernel for
>> ipv4.
>> I would look at your command:
>> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m conntrac
> From: "Daniel M."
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:58:49 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] iptables
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 19:05 +, William Harrington wrote:
>
.
.
> > [...] --hitcount 6 --name SSH -j DROP
> >
.
.
>
> From: "Daniel M."
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:58:49 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] iptables
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 19:05 +, William Harrington wrote:
>
> > I looked at your config settings and conntrack is in the kernel for ipv4.
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 22:37 +, William Harrington wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Run the script one line at a time and you can add verbosity to iptables
> with multiple verbose options "-v" or "-vv" or more, view the man page.
> When you hit the error, you should get more information. I'm still
>
Hello Campers,
I used to be a Unix/Linux administrator and I built an LFS/BLFS
internet server many years ago and loved it. I was planing on building a
workstation after I retired 6 years ago. As it turned out I never got
around to it because I got busy doing other things and now that it ha
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:47:01PM -0600, Arnie Stender wrote:
> Hello Campers,
Hi Arnie, ISTR your name from past postings.
> I used to be a Unix/Linux administrator and I built an LFS/BLFS internet
> server many years ago and loved it. I was planing on building a workstation
> after I retir
Sorry, I get these as a single daily digest, so it was natural for me to
reply to the whole thing in one message--but that doesn't make the reply
very obvious. I'd better do this part with the proper Subject.
>
> Ok. I deleted the whole directory and rerun this chapter again => NO
> FAILED TEST.
15 matches
Mail list logo