On 03/25/2017 01:53 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:29:41PM -0400, Richard wrote:
In the LFS-7.10 book the following note
related to the gcc testsuite is included:
--
On some systems, numerous test failures
(over 1100
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:29:41PM -0400, Richard wrote:
> In the LFS-7.10 book the following note
> related to the gcc testsuite is included:
>
> --
> On some systems, numerous test failures
> (over 1100 unexpected failures out of
> over
In the LFS-7.10 book the following note
related to the gcc testsuite is included:
--
On some systems, numerous test failures
(over 1100 unexpected failures out of
over 200,000 tests) have been reported.
These failures in
On 03/25/2017 04:01 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi again
On my full lfs 8.0 rebuild, I have built shadow 4.4 as specified on
the lfs page, however I did it the "blfs way" of first installing pam.
When building shadow, I got the following error:
su.c:376:3: error: too few arguments to
Hi again
On my full lfs 8.0 rebuild, I have built shadow 4.4 as specified on the
lfs page, however I did it the "blfs way" of first installing pam.
When building shadow, I got the following error:
su.c:376:3: error: too few arguments to function 'snprintf'
snprintf (kill_msg, _("
On 03/24/2017 09:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the
situation
that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is compiled
before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This
