Re: [lfs-support] some observations about LFS 8.3 + jhalfs

On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 12:25:18PM +0100, Thomas Seeling wrote: > Hallo, > > > I assume those first and last were for packages that aren't in BLFS ? > > there were also packages from LFS and BLFS which showed that. > Imho it's not directly stemming from changes in glibc but in stricter gcc > chec

Re: [lfs-support] What the heck do I have to do to get this to JUST WORK?!?!

On 31/12/2018 10:46 pm, Hazel Russman wrote: Il 28 dic 2018 4:23 AM, "Kent Cooper" ha scritto: At first I had weird permission problems at every turn because my /etc/fstab was mounting my LFS partition with the noexec flag for some ridiculous reason. That's probably because you had it mo

Re: [lfs-support] What the heck do I have to do to get this to JUST WORK?!?!

On 31/12/2018 8:22 am, Michele Bucca wrote: Il 28 dic 2018 4:23 AM, "Kent Cooper" > ha scritto: So now I'm on chapter 5.10 of book version 8.3, trying to build the second pass of GCC but I keep running into the same errors after 3 complete restarts. I

Re: [lfs-support] What the heck do I have to do to get this to JUST WORK?!?!

On 31/12/2018 2:04 am, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: It'd be nice to think the last few seconds of your work were still saved in some state. Is there a way to make a secondary copy that you could test? My question is based on my perception of playing with several various "VM" packages that might not

Re: [lfs-support] some observations about LFS 8.3 + jhalfs

Hallo, I assume those first and last were for packages that aren't in BLFS ? there were also packages from LFS and BLFS which showed that. Imho it's not directly stemming from changes in glibc but in stricter gcc checking, more warnings enabled and less assuming what the programmer wanted to