Re: [lfs-support] Suggestion: note regarding patches in the toolchain

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:34:39PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > Hi! > > When following instructions in Section 5.7 (Glibc) > of > the LFS Book (version 9.1) I realized I had downloaded the patch (fhs) for > glibc and was

Re: [lfs-support] Missing note in Section 5.11 of the LFS Book?

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:36:41PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > In Section 5.11 (Tcl) > of the > LFS Book (v. 9.1) a final note is apparently missing, regarding the > necessity of keeping the directory

Re: [lfs-support] Suggestion: note regarding patches in the toolchain

Em qui., 6 de ago. de 2020 às 21:02, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:34:39PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > > Hi! > > > > When following instructions in Section 5.7 (Glibc) > > > of > > the LFS Book

Re: [lfs-support] Missing note in Section 5.11 of the LFS Book?

Em qui., 6 de ago. de 2020 às 20:51, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:36:41PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > > In Section 5.11 (Tcl) > > of > the > > LFS Book (v. 9.1) a final note is apparently missing,

[lfs-support] Missing note in Section 5.11 of the LFS Book?

In Section 5.11 (Tcl) of the LFS Book (v. 9.1) a final note is apparently missing, regarding the necessity of keeping the directory /mnt/lfs/sources/tcl8.6.10 in order to be able to compile expect5.45 (it requires the private

[lfs-support] Suggestion: note regarding patches in the toolchain

Hi! When following instructions in Section 5.7 (Glibc) of the LFS Book (version 9.1) I realized I had downloaded the patch (fhs) for glibc and was unsure whether to use it or not, so I started googling trying to figure out