akhiezer wrote:
From: Hazel Russman Date: Thu, 25 Aug
2016 17:28:07 +0100 Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.10 rc1. Tool
chain technical notes 5.2
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:54:46 -0500 Bruce Dubbs
wrote:
Hazel Russman wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:18 +0200 Pierre Labastie
wrote:
On 25/08
> I guess you mean the sentence "The compiler is generally not an issue
> since Glibc will always use the compiler relating to the /|--host|/
> parameter passed to its configure script, e.g. in our case,
> i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc". I trust you about English, but for me, the
> "e.g." may as well
> From: Hazel Russman
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:28:07 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.10 rc1. Tool chain technical notes 5.2
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:54:46 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > Hazel Russman wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:1
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:54:46 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Hazel Russman wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:18 +0200 Pierre Labastie
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 25/08/2016 12:32, Hazel Russman wrote:
> >>> There seem to be a couple of typos in the paragraph on building
> >>> glibc. The --host para
Hazel Russman wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:18 +0200 Pierre Labastie
wrote:
On 25/08/2016 12:32, Hazel Russman wrote:
There seem to be a couple of typos in the paragraph on building
glibc. The --host parameter would be $LFS_TGT which evaluates (for
a 32-bit system) to i686-lfs-linux-gnu, n
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:18 +0200
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> On 25/08/2016 12:32, Hazel Russman wrote:
> > There seem to be a couple of typos in the paragraph on building glibc. The
> > --host parameter would be $LFS_TGT which evaluates (for a 32-bit system) to
> > i686-lfs-linux-gnu, not i686-l
On 25/08/2016 12:32, Hazel Russman wrote:
There seem to be a couple of typos in the paragraph on building glibc. The
--host parameter would be $LFS_TGT which evaluates (for a 32-bit system) to
i686-lfs-linux-gnu, not i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc as written.
Hazel
Hi Hazel,
I guess you mean the se
There seem to be a couple of typos in the paragraph on building glibc. The
--host parameter would be $LFS_TGT which evaluates (for a 32-bit system) to
i686-lfs-linux-gnu, not i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc as written.
Hazel
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linux