On 03/24/2017 09:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the
situation
that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is compiled
before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This wo
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the situation
that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is compiled
before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would
allow me to get the same results later i
On 03/24/2017 08:56 PM, Glaudiston Gomes da Silva wrote:
I think it's necessary only if you run autogen.sh script. If you
decompress the tarball and run the "configure" script directly flex is
not a prerequisite.
2017-03-24 16:51 GMT-03:00 Michael D. L. :
As I read Tim Tassonis message, it's
I think it's necessary only if you run autogen.sh script. If you
decompress the tarball and run the "configure" script directly flex is
not a prerequisite.
2017-03-24 16:51 GMT-03:00 Michael D. L. :
>
>
>
> On 03/24/2017 08:02 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I am just in the process of
On 03/24/2017 08:02 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the
situation that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but
is compiled before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would
allow me t
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the
situation that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is
compiled before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would
allow me to get the same results later if I recompile bin