Joseph Artsimovich jos...@mirriad.com writes:
On 18/07/2011 22:56, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Joseph Artsimovichjos...@mirriad.com writes:
On 18/07/2011 15:45, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Maximmax_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
An integer implementation is
On 18/07/2011 19:08, Maxim wrote:
Am 18.07.2011 18:11, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
Ronald S. Bultjersbul...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Joseph Artsimovichjos...@mirriad.com wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:29, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Joseph
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:27:06AM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 19:08, Maxim wrote:
Am 18.07.2011 18:11, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
Ronald S. Bultjersbul...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Joseph Artsimovichjos...@mirriad.com
wrote:
On
On 18/07/2011 17:11, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Ronald S. Bultjersbul...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Joseph Artsimovichjos...@mirriad.com wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:29, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
Here is the latest version of my patch set, made against today's Git.
I think I addressed all raised issues, except I decided not to mess
with dsputil.c, at least until we actually have some
assembly-accelerated routines for
On 18/07/2011 12:06, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
Here is the latest version of my patch set, made against today's Git.
I think I addressed all raised issues, except I decided not to mess
with dsputil.c, at least until we actually have some
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:53:46PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 12:06, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
Here is the latest version of my patch set, made against today's Git.
I think I addressed all raised issues, except I
Joseph Artsimovich jos...@mirriad.com writes:
Here is the latest version of my patch set, made against today's Git.
I think I addressed all raised issues, except I decided not to mess
with dsputil.c, at least until we actually have some
assembly-accelerated routines for 10-bit DNxHD.
It
Am 18.07.2011 14:10, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
Why are you using the incredibly slow floating-point dct anyway? It
can't be that hard to extend one of the integer ones to 10-bit. It
shouldn't take more than updating the coefficients and some shift
values.
Unfortunately such a task
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
Here is the latest version of my patch set, made against today's Git.
--- a/libavcodec/dnxhddec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/dnxhddec.c
@@ -43,20 +47,33 @@ typedef struct {
+static void dnxhd_8bit_idct_put(DNXHDContext* ctx,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:45:30PM +0200, Maxim wrote:
I was able to update the existing Altivec code (ppc/idct_altivec.c) to
support 10bit and would submit a patch if someone cares. Unfortunately I
don't have any solution for x86 etc.
There's never a reason not to submit such a patch - go
Maxim max_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 14:10, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
Why are you using the incredibly slow floating-point dct anyway? It
can't be that hard to extend one of the integer ones to 10-bit. It
shouldn't take more than updating the coefficients and some shift
values.
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
An integer implementation is surely much faster than floating-point
one but it's still insufficient for realtime applications
The point?
You'll be able to obtain reasonable performance benefits only by using
SIMD-optimized code.
Maxim max_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
An integer implementation is surely much faster than floating-point
one but it's still insufficient for realtime applications
The point?
You'll be able to obtain reasonable performance benefits
On 18/07/2011 15:45, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Maximmax_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
An integer implementation is surely much faster than floating-point
one but it's still insufficient for realtime applications
The point?
You'll be able to obtain
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 15:45, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Maximmax_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
An integer implementation is surely much faster than floating-point
one but it's still
On 18/07/2011 16:01, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 15:45, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Maximmax_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
An integer implementation is surely much faster than
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:01, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 15:45, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Maximmax_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
On 18/07/2011 16:29, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:01, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 15:45, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Maximmax_p...@gmx.dewrites:
Am
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Kostya kostya.shish...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:53:46PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 12:06, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
Here is the latest version of my patch set,
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Joseph Artsimovich jos...@mirriad.com wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:29, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:01, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Joseph Artsimovich jos...@mirriad.com
wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:29, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:01, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at
Am 18.07.2011 18:11, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Joseph Artsimovich jos...@mirriad.com
wrote:
On 18/07/2011 16:29, Kostya wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Joseph Artsimovich
Joseph Artsimovich jos...@mirriad.com writes:
On 18/07/2011 15:45, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Maximmax_p...@gmx.de writes:
Am 18.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Måns Rullgård:
[...]
An integer implementation is surely much faster than floating-point
one but it's still insufficient for realtime
24 matches
Mail list logo
