From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
Defining restrict results - for some compilers - in changing other
uses of the restrict keyword also, e.g. __declspec(restrict) gets
changed to __declspec(__restrict) on MSVC. This causes compilation
failures. Therefore, using a private namespace macro instead is
more rel
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
>
> Defining restrict results - for some compilers - in changing other
> uses of the restrict keyword also, e.g. __declspec(restrict) gets
> changed to __declspec(__restrict) on MSVC. This causes compilation
> failures. Therefore, using a pri
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>
>> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
>>
>> Defining restrict results - for some compilers - in changing other
>> uses of the restrict keyword also, e.g. __declspec(restrict) gets
>> changed to __declspec(__restrict)
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> > "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> >
> >> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
> >>
> >> Defining restrict results - for some compilers - in changing other
> >> uses of the restri
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Kostya Shishkov
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> > "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> >
>> >> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
>> >>
>> >> Defining restrict results -
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:41:35AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> > "Ronald S. Bultje" write
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Kostya Shishkov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:41:35AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Kostya Shishkov
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:4
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:10:15AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:41:35AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Kostya Shishkov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:10:15AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Kostya Shishkov
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:41:35AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:3
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:22:26AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:10:15AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jun 16, 20
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Kostya Shishkov
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:22:26AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Kostya Shishkov
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:10:15AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:58
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:35:39AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:22:26AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jun 16, 201
On 06/16/2012 03:02 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we work
> together and make that happen or shall we just cry like little zealous
> babies while the real world passes by?
Reality is that either you add 10 lines in the preprocessor that
Kostya Shishkov writes:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:35:39AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Kostya Shishkov
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:22:26AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Kostya Shishkov
>> >>
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 03:02 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we work
>> together and make that happen or shall we just cry like little zealous
>> babies while the real world passes by?
>
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> On 06/16/2012 03:02 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we work
>>> together and make that happen or shall we just cry like little zealous
>>> ba
On 06/16/2012 06:33 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> On 06/16/2012 03:02 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we work
>>> together and make that happen or shall we just cry like l
Luca Barbato writes:
> On 06/16/2012 06:33 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2012 03:02 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we work
together and make that hap
Måns Rullgård writes:
> Luca Barbato writes:
>
>> On 06/16/2012 06:33 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 06/16/2012 03:02 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we wor
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> > "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> >> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
> >>
> >> Defining restrict results - for some compilers - in changing other
> >> uses of the restrict keyword al
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we work
>> together and make that happen or shall we just cry like little zealous
>> babies while the real world passes by?
>
> Comments like this are not exactly helping, but yo
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 07:05:22PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>
> >> I wish to support a compiler that does not support c99. Shall we work
> >> together and make that happen or shall we just cry like little zealous
> >> babies while the
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> > "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> >> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
>> >>
>> >> Defining restrict results - for some comp
Alex Converse writes:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> > "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>>> >> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
>>> >>
>>> >> Defining
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Replacing restrict with av_restrict fundamentally doesn't seem worse
then any of these other restrictions.
This is fundamentally different because it changes the allowed syntax
from C99 to something slightly different. Such a change puts an
additional
Martin Storsjö writes:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>>> Replacing restrict with av_restrict fundamentally doesn't seem worse
>>> then any of these other restrictions.
>>
>> This is fundamentally different because it changes the allowed syntax
>> from C99 to something slightly dif
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Martin Storsjö writes:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Replacing restrict with av_restrict fundamentally doesn't seem worse
then any of these other restrictions.
This is fundamentally different because it changes the allowed syntax
from
Martin Storsjö writes:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> Martin Storsjö writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>
> Replacing restrict with av_restrict fundamentally doesn't seem worse
> then any of these other restrictions.
This is fundamental
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:23:48AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> > "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> >> >> From:
29 matches
Mail list logo