Nevermind, apparently I didn't read down far enough and inet_pton() is
in that same _BSD_VISIBLE #ifdef.
-- Sean
On 4/24/11, Sean McGovern wrote:
> 2011/4/24 Måns Rullgård
>
>> Diego Biurrun writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:29:36PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> >> Diego Biurrun wri
2011/4/24 Måns Rullgård
> Diego Biurrun writes:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:29:36PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> Diego Biurrun writes:
> >> >
> >> > The FreeBSD FATE box passes '-D__BSD_VISIBLE -D__XSI_VISIBLE=600' as
> >> > extra CFLAGS to configure:
> >> >
> >> > http://fate.libav.or
Diego Biurrun writes:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:29:36PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Diego Biurrun writes:
>> >
>> > The FreeBSD FATE box passes '-D__BSD_VISIBLE -D__XSI_VISIBLE=600' as
>> > extra CFLAGS to configure:
>> >
>> > http://fate.libav.org/x86_32-freebsd-gcc-4.4/20110423101824
>>
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:29:36PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Diego Biurrun writes:
> >
> > The FreeBSD FATE box passes '-D__BSD_VISIBLE -D__XSI_VISIBLE=600' as
> > extra CFLAGS to configure:
> >
> > http://fate.libav.org/x86_32-freebsd-gcc-4.4/20110423101824
> >
> > I think the DragonFlay box
Diego Biurrun writes:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:04:49PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>>
>> As far as I can see, there's nothing else you can define to make it work,
>> except undefining _POSIX_C_SOURCE. Here's the relevant parts of
>> sys/cdefs.h
>> (http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfl
On 4/23/11 12:26 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:04:49PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
As far as I can see, there's nothing else you can define to make it work,
except undefining _POSIX_C_SOURCE. Here's the relevant parts of
sys/cdefs.h
(http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonf
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:04:49PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
> As far as I can see, there's nothing else you can define to make it work,
> except undefining _POSIX_C_SOURCE. Here's the relevant parts of
> sys/cdefs.h
> (http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/blob?f=sys/sys/cdefs.h):
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Martin Storsjö writes:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >
> >> __BSD_VISIBLE should not be set directly, IIRC. _BSD_SOURCE is the
> >> correct symbol to define. This can be done with add_cppflags -D_BSD_SOURCE
> >> in the relevant OS
Martin Storsjö writes:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>> >> Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
>> >> since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> >> Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
> >> since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set.
> >>
> >> Alternati
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>> Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
>> since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set.
>>
>> Alternatively, a line defining __BSD_VISIBLE=1 could be
>> added at th
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:48:16AM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> > Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
> > since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set.
> >
> > --- a/doc/general.texi
> > +++ b/doc/general.texi
>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:48:16AM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
> since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set.
>
> --- a/doc/general.texi
> +++ b/doc/general.texi
> @@ -784,9 +784,9 @@ to configure.
>
> -@subsubsectio
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:30:57PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> > Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
> > since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set.
> >
> > Alternatively, a line defining __B
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
> since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set.
>
> Alternatively, a line defining __BSD_VISIBLE=1 could be
> added at the top of os_support.c. For FreeBSD, sim
Setting this should fix the FATE build failure on DragonFly BSD,
since inet_aton only is visible if __BSD_VISIBLE is set.
Alternatively, a line defining __BSD_VISIBLE=1 could be
added at the top of os_support.c. For FreeBSD, similar lines
are required in libavdevice/bktr.c and libavdevice/oss_audi
16 matches
Mail list logo
