Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi writes:
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 07:05 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi wrote:
The current generic C implementation, which is always used when the
public header is included from other
The current generic C implementation, which is always used when the
public header is included from other programs (either directly or
through intreadwrite.h) compiles to a mess like this (gcc-4.6 on AMD64):
movq%rdi, %rdx
shrq$32, %rdx
movl%edx, %eax
On 4/24/11 8:06 AM, Uoti Urpala wrote:
+#elif 0
Maybe if 0 code could be removed or investigated.
Beside that the patch seems ok.
lu
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi wrote:
The current generic C implementation, which is always used when the
public header is included from other programs (either directly or
through intreadwrite.h) compiles to a mess like this (gcc-4.6 on AMD64):
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 07:05 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi wrote:
The current generic C implementation, which is always used when the
public header is included from other programs (either directly or
through
