[libav-devel] [PATCH] acelp: Fix possible endless loop when decoding amr

2011-12-19 Thread Martin Storsjö
From: Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at Reviewed-by: Vitor Sessak --- libavcodec/acelp_vectors.c | 22 +- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/acelp_vectors.c b/libavcodec/acelp_vectors.c index b7c05e7..be182c6 100644 ---

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] acelp: Fix possible endless loop when decoding amr

2011-12-19 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote: From: Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at Reviewed-by: Vitor Sessak --- libavcodec/acelp_vectors.c | 22 +- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) They scrape our bugzilla for

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] acelp: Fix possible endless loop when decoding amr

2011-12-19 Thread Luca Barbato
On 19/12/11 20:30, Martin Storsjö wrote: +if (in-pitch_lag 0) { Can pitch_lag be 0 in a normal bitstream ? lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero ___ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] acelp: Fix possible endless loop when decoding amr

2011-12-19 Thread Luca Barbato
On 20/12/11 02:42, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Luca Barbatolu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 19/12/11 20:30, Martin Storsjö wrote: +if (in-pitch_lag 0) { Can pitch_lag be0 in a normal bitstream ? No. Even a pitch_lag of 1 or 2 is highly