On 06/07/14 07:24, Andrew Kelley wrote:
This fixes a segmentation fault because request_frame in fifo.c assumes
that the call to ff_request_frame will populate fifo-root.next.
Before, it was possible for request_frame in af_compand to not do this,
resulting in a null pointer access. Now,
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 22:24:43 -0700, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This fixes a segmentation fault because request_frame in fifo.c assumes
that the call to ff_request_frame will populate fifo-root.next.
Before, it was possible for request_frame in af_compand to not do this,
This fixes a segmentation fault because request_frame in fifo.c assumes
that the call to ff_request_frame will populate fifo-root.next.
Before, it was possible for request_frame in af_compand to not do this,
resulting in a null pointer access. Now, request_frame in af_compand
always will return at
