Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2016-06-10 00:35:03)
> This mimics the behaviour of other av_*_new_side_data().
> This is not caught by the malloc check, since AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE
> is always added to the allocated size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara
> ---
> This is assuming that packet
This mimics the behaviour of other av_*_new_side_data().
This is not caught by the malloc check, since AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE
is always added to the allocated size.
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara
---
This is assuming that packet side data cannot be used empty.
[documentation needed]
Vittor
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> This mimics the behaviour of other av_*_new_side_data().
> This is not caught by the malloc check, since AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE
> is always added to the allocated size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara
> ---
> This is assuming tha
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> This mimics the behaviour of other av_*_new_side_data().
> This is not caught by the malloc check, since AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE
> is always added to the allocated size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara
> ---
> This is assuming t
This mimics the behaviour of other av_*_new_side_data().
This is not caught by the malloc check, since AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE
is always added to the allocated size.
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara
---
This is assuming that packet side data cannot be used empty.
[documentation needed]
Vittor
