On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Martin Storsjö writes:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Martin Storsjö writes:
DEP_LIBS is part of $^, since DEP_LIBS is a dependency of the
test tools. The libs, that originate in the FFLIBS variable,
are added into FFEXTRALIBS already (n
Martin Storsjö writes:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> Martin Storsjö writes:
>>
>>> DEP_LIBS is part of $^, since DEP_LIBS is a dependency of the
>>> test tools. The libs, that originate in the FFLIBS variable,
>>> are added into FFEXTRALIBS already (normally in the form -lavuti
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Martin Storsjö writes:
DEP_LIBS is part of $^, since DEP_LIBS is a dependency of the
test tools. The libs, that originate in the FFLIBS variable,
are added into FFEXTRALIBS already (normally in the form -lavutil),
but via DEP_LIBS in the literal form a
Martin Storsjö writes:
> DEP_LIBS is part of $^, since DEP_LIBS is a dependency of the
> test tools. The libs, that originate in the FFLIBS variable,
> are added into FFEXTRALIBS already (normally in the form -lavutil),
> but via DEP_LIBS in the literal form as libavutil/libavutil.so.
>
> Previou
DEP_LIBS is part of $^, since DEP_LIBS is a dependency of the
test tools. The libs, that originate in the FFLIBS variable,
are added into FFEXTRALIBS already (normally in the form -lavutil),
but via DEP_LIBS in the literal form as libavutil/libavutil.so.
Previously, when building test tools, the m
