Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2017-02-27 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:54:11PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, > resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies > are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not > all dependencies were

[libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2017-02-27 Thread Diego Biurrun
Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not all dependencies were taken into account, resulting in some cases of underlinking. To addre

[libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2017-02-25 Thread Diego Biurrun
Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not all dependencies were taken into account, resulting in some cases of underlinking. To addre

[libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2017-02-08 Thread Diego Biurrun
Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not all dependencies were taken into account, resulting in some cases of underlinking. To addre

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2016-12-21 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 06:47:45PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:15:56 +0100 > "Diego Biurrun" wrote: > > > Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, > > resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies > > are shared across libraries. A

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2016-12-20 Thread wm4
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:15:56 +0100 "Diego Biurrun" wrote: > Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, > resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies > are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not > all dependencies were ta

[libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2016-12-20 Thread Diego Biurrun
Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not all dependencies were taken into account, resulting in some cases of underlinking. To addre

[libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2016-12-12 Thread Diego Biurrun
Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not all dependencies were taken into account, resulting in some cases of underlinking. To addre

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2016-12-01 Thread Luca Barbato
On 01/12/2016 15:39, Diego Biurrun wrote: > - Possibly I should still investigate Janne's idea of using the > function name as variable name instead of adding a library name > parameter to things like check_lib(). That could require extra care in picking the function. _

[libav-devel] [PATCH] build: Fine-grained link-time dependency settings

2016-12-01 Thread Diego Biurrun
Previously, all link-time dependencies were added for all libraries, resulting in bogus link-time dependencies since not all dependencies are shared across libraries. Also, in some cases like libavutil, not all dependencies were taken into account, resulting in some cases of underlinking. To addre