Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>>
>> The dc-only mode is already checked to work correctly above, but this
>>>
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
The dc-only mode is already checked to work correctly above, but this
allows benchmarking this mode for performance tuning, and allows making
sure that it actually is
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> The dc-only mode is already checked to work correctly above, but this
> allows benchmarking this mode for performance tuning, and allows making
> sure that it actually is correctly hooked up.
> ---
>
On 2016-11-14 23:46:14 +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> The dc-only mode is already checked to work correctly above, but this
> allows benchmarking this mode for performance tuning, and allows making
> sure that it actually is correctly hooked up.
> ---
> tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c | 6 ++
> 1
On 14/11/2016 22:46, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> The dc-only mode is already checked to work correctly above, but this
> allows benchmarking this mode for performance tuning, and allows making
> sure that it actually is correctly hooked up.
> ---
> tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c | 6 ++
> 1 file
The dc-only mode is already checked to work correctly above, but this
allows benchmarking this mode for performance tuning, and allows making
sure that it actually is correctly hooked up.
---
tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c