On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:36:12AM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> 2012/1/25 Diego Biurrun :
> > Never mind, I looked at the subject line of the mail, but you
> > attached the patch and did not send git-send-email...
>
> Ping?
Queued.
Diego
___
liba
Hi,
2012/1/25 Diego Biurrun :
> Never mind, I looked at the subject line of the mail, but you
> attached the patch and did not send git-send-email...
Ping?
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:43:22PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:40:17PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> > 2012/1/25 Loren Merritt :
> > >>+ mov %+ %1 m0, [r1 + 0]
> > >
> > > mov%1
> >
> > Indeed.
> >
> > Also changed a bit the patch title.
>
> It would be nice t
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:40:17PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> 2012/1/25 Loren Merritt :
> >>+ mov %+ %1 m0, [r1 + 0]
> >
> > mov%1
>
> Indeed.
>
> Also changed a bit the patch title.
It would be nice to have "x86" in the patch title.
Diego
_
Hi,
2012/1/25 Loren Merritt :
>>+ mov %+ %1 m0, [r1 + 0]
>
> mov%1
Indeed.
Also changed a bit the patch title.
Best regards,
Christophe
From c8ce1bf47248ea2cef8d762d58c7a20693470af4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe GISQUET
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:48:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] x
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
>+ mov %+ %1 m0, [r1 + 0]
mov%1
--Loren Merritt
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
2012/1/21 Christophe Gisquet :
> Anyway, here's an updated patch taking into account Loren's comments.
Ping?
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
Hi,
2012/1/19 Jason Garrett-Glaser :
> Is the SSE2 version faster than using 64-bit bswap on x86_64? If not,
> it shouldn't be used on 64-bit.
If you mean something like the attached patch (MD5 validated), then
it's almost a tie: on a longer sequence to reduce error measures and a
64bits system,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> +%if %1 == 0
> +%define MOVR mova
> +%else
> +%define MOVR movu
> +%endif
If you passed u/a instead of 1/0, you wouldn't need to define MOVR.
--Loren Merritt
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@li
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Christophe Gisquet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Note:
> - I have tried SSE4 (and pextrd for the remaining cases) with a
> testcase on fewer elements (eg mpc7), but that was not faster
> - Unrolling SSSE3 only up to 4 is slower
> - Unrolling up to 16 doesn't change things
>
> I
Hi,
Note:
- I have tried SSE4 (and pextrd for the remaining cases) with a
testcase on fewer elements (eg mpc7), but that was not faster
- Unrolling SSSE3 only up to 4 is slower
- Unrolling up to 16 doesn't change things
I'm not sure it's worth writing a MMX2 version. Maybe building several
versio
11 matches
Mail list logo